ArticleCureus2024
Iatrogenic Bladder Injury During Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Case Report and Discussion of Anatomic Variations.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hysterectomy, one of the most common surgical procedures performed in women worldwide, assumes a very important role in the definitive management of diverse gynecologic conditions. This case report presents a compelling instance of an iatrogenic bladder perforation that occurred during laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a 47-year-old woman with a high body mass index, extensive surgical history, and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. Despite considerable preoperative planning and the use of minimally invasive techniques, the occurrence of physician-induced bladder perforation highlights the significance of understanding anatomical relationships and variations. The patient's previous abdominal surgeries including two cesarean sections, appendectomy, and cholecystectomy likely contributed to scar formation and adhesions, making dissection challenging. The case report and following discussion delve into anatomical variations, as well as the diagnosis and management of iatrogenic bladder injuries. The presented case serves as a valuable addition to the literature, contributing insights into the challenges and considerations surrounding urinary tract injuries during hysterectomy. This paper aims to review current research and guide practicing obstetricians and gynecologists in the management of intraoperative bladder injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.