ArticleCureus2024
Knowledge, Attitude, Awareness, and Future Expectations of Robotic Surgery in Patients Attending Surgical Specialties Clinics.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- From expectations to experiences: a systematic review of patient and public perspectives on robotic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Public Perceptions and Determinants of Preference for Robotic-Assisted Surgery in the United Arab Emirates: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Patient Perceptions of Robotic-Assisted Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Among Orthopaedic Outpatient Attendees: A Cross-Sectional Survey in an Irish Tertiary Center.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Article
- Shaping the future of surgery: A scoping review of current robotic practices in KSA.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- Unveiling the landscape of robotic surgery: Insights into Indian medical perspectives.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Robotic-assisted surgery in Egypt: national insights into awareness, knowledge, and perceptions among surgeons and patients.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery at the operational level: an investigation of surgeons' perspectives.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Surgery: Transforming Outcomes and Shaping the Future.Clinics and practice · 2025Review
- Public awareness and perception of robotic-assisted surgery: a cross-sectional analysis of sociodemographic influences.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The use of robotic-assisted surgeries (RAS) has been growing in surgical specialties. It allows surgeons to perform higher-quality operations with fewer complications, mortality, and morbidity. However, there are a lot of misconceptions about RAS among patients. Therefore, our study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, awareness, and future expectations of RAS in patients attending surgical clinics. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) surgical clinics in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All participants <18 years of age were excluded. The questionnaire was distributed to 304 patients attending surgical clinics with a confidence level of 95% and a margin of error of 5%. Cluster sampling was used since the respondents were from multiple surgical specialties. Finally, multivariate analysis was performed to assess participants' preference for robotic surgery. Results Most participants (58.6%, n=178) were between 21 and 40 years old, and males were 52% of the participants. Many respondents thought a robot did not do the surgery. 70.7% of respondents had not heard of robotic surgery, with the media being the most common source of information. Internal damage was the prevalent concern (51.0%, n= 155) in malfunctions of robotic surgery. A significant relationship was found between participants from 21 to 40 years of age and a stronger preference for robotic surgery (p=.027). Respondents who preferred robotic surgery were discovered to have a significant relationship with participants who thought robotic surgery was safer and had better results (p<.001). 13.9% of participants who did not prefer robotic surgery also took cost into account significantly (χ2=28.93, p<.001, Cramer's V=.22). 67.2% (n=43) of respondents who preferred robotic surgery believed it might eventually replace present practices. Conclusion Our study concluded that the majority did not favor or were unsure whether to undergo robotic surgeries or not. However, most participants had some misconceptions and a lack of awareness about robotic surgeries. Raising awareness among patients can improve the mutual decision-making between them and their treating physician.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.