Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38646258›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Mucinous Differentiation in Colorectal Cancer: A 10-Year Experience Audit at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah.

Khalid A Alshehri, Naif Alsulaimani, Wejdan A Alghamdi, Zuhoor Almansouri, Syed A Zubair, Jamal Zekri, Haitham Saimeh, Sufian Sultan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rethinking mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma classification: evidence from histopathology and RAS mutations.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Khalid A AlshehriSurgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, SAU.
Naif AlsulaimaniGeneral Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, SAU.
Wejdan A AlghamdiGeneral Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, SAU.
Zuhoor AlmansouriAnatomic Pathology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, SAU.
Syed A ZubairMedical Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, SAU.
Jamal ZekriOncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, SAU.
Haitham SaimehGeneral Surgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, SAU.
Sufian SultanSurgery, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, SAU.
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SAAlfaisal University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given that colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality, mucinous adenocarcinoma is one of the subtypes and is characterized by the presence of mucin-producing tumor cells with mucin components and is more challenging to manage. In Saudi Arabia, it represents approximately 10-15% of all colorectal carcinoma. The main etiological cause of mucinous adenocarcinoma is yet not well understood. The main goal of our study is to discuss the histopathology and the molecular background of mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma and also to provide an update on its prognosis and therapeutics from recent published literature. It is a retrospective cohort study that was conducted at King Faisal Specialist Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The study included 68 adult patients diagnosed with mucinous colon cancer, who did surgical resection alone or with or without adjuvant chemotherapy following from January 2011 to December 2020. The mucinous subtypes are found more commonly in the proximal colon. In our study, 26 patients (38.2% of the cases) were right-sided and 35 patients (51.5%) were from the left side, but these included the rectum as well and this reflects the higher incidence of diagnosis of rectal cancer in the region. Most tumors were classified as Grade II in 56 patients (82.4%), consistent with the intermediate differentiation status often associated with the mucinous subtypes. The most common symptom at presentation was abdominal pain in 38 patients (55.9%) followed by per rectal bleeding and abdominal mass. The management in our study was in line with the standard established practice and surgical resection as expected was the primary potentially curative approach. Notably of patients presenting with locally advanced rectal cancer, six patients underwent concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and four patients had upfront surgery. The duration of the median follow-up was 32 months. At the time of analysis, 30 patients (44.1%) were alive and remained on regular follow-up, 17 patients (25%) had succumbed to the disease, and 21 patients (30.9%) were lost to follow-up. The median overall survival was not reached, and notably, 49 patients (71.6%) remained alive at the four-year mark. Whilst our study contributes to the current understanding of mucinous adenocarcinomas of the colon, further research in molecular profiling and genomic testing and larger clinical trials with tailored treatments is necessary to refine treatment strategies and improve outcomes.

Indexed as

chemo radiotherapy (chemo-rt)colorectal cancer surgerycolorectal surgerygi oncologyoncologysurgery

Identifiers

PMID38646258
PMCPMC11032733
OpenAlexW4393066685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.