Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38646209›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning to Optimize Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols.

Zukhruf Zain, Mohammed Khaleel I Kh Almadhoun, Lara Alsadoun, Syed Faqeer Hussain Bokhari

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Time-sequential prediction of postoperative complications after gastric cancer surgery using machine learning: a multicenter cohort study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zukhruf ZainFamily Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Mohammed Khaleel I Kh AlmadhounMedicine and Surgery, Mutah University, Karak, JOR.
Lara AlsadounTrauma and Orthopedics, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, GBR.
Syed Faqeer Hussain BokhariSurgery, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have transformed perioperative care by implementing evidence-based strategies to hasten patient recovery, decrease complications, and shorten hospital stays. However, challenges such as inconsistent adherence and the need for personalized adjustments persist, prompting exploration into innovative solutions. The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) offers a promising avenue for optimizing ERAS protocols. While ERAS emphasizes preoperative optimization, minimally invasive surgery (MIS), and standardized postoperative care, challenges such as adherence variability and resource constraints impede its effectiveness. AI/ML technologies offer opportunities to overcome these challenges by enabling real-time risk prediction, personalized interventions, and efficient resource allocation. AI/ML applications in ERAS extend to patient risk stratification, personalized care plans, and outcome prediction. By analyzing extensive patient datasets, AI/ML algorithms can predict individual patient risks and tailor interventions accordingly. Moreover, AI/ML facilitates proactive interventions through predictive modeling of postoperative outcomes, optimizing resource allocation, and enhancing patient care. Despite the potential benefits, integrating AI and ML into ERAS protocols faces obstacles such as data access, ethical considerations, and healthcare professional training. Overcoming these challenges requires a human-centered approach, fostering collaboration among clinicians, data scientists, and patients. Transparent communication, robust cybersecurity measures, and ethical model validation are crucial for successful integration. It is essential to ensure that AI and ML complement rather than replace human expertise, with clinicians maintaining oversight and accountability.

Indexed as

aiartificial intelligenceenhanced recovery after surgeryerasmachine learningmlpatient risk stratificationperioperative carepersonalized interventionsreal-time risk prediction

Identifiers

PMID38646209
PMCPMC11032416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.