ArticleCureus2024
Clinical and Microbiological Evaluation of Diode Laser and Systemic Doxycycline as an Additive to Scaling and Root Planing for Stage II and Stage III Periodontitis Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo assess and contrast the effectiveness of systemic doxycycline and diode laser as supplements to scaling and root planing (SRP) in terms of clinical and microbiological parameters. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 33 patients diagnosed with periodontitis stages II and III were included and randomized into group A (SRP + diode laser), group B (SRP + doxycycline), and group C (SRP alone). Selected sites were assessed for clinical and microbial parameters-plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), pocket probing depth (PPD), relative attachment level (RAL), and colony-forming units (CFUs). Every clinical parameter was noted at baseline and after three months. The arithmetic mean, followed by the standard deviation, was calculated for the required assessment intervals. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare all parameters between groups, and if the results of the ANOVA test were significant, post hoc analysis was performed. For intragroup comparison, student t-tests were performed.
resultsThe clinical parameters significantly improved within three months for all groups. In terms of relative attachment level, a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) was obtained at the three-month interval compared to the baseline value, with the most statistically significant difference seen in group A (3.36±0.50 to 0.64±0.50), followed by group B (3.18±0.40 to 2.18±0.40). The mean pocket probing depth observed at three months, compared to the baseline value, showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) in group A (5.91±0.70 to 2.18±0.40) compared to group B (6.18±0.75 to 4.36±0.50), followed by group C (5.82±0.75 to 5.27±0.64).
conclusionThe use of diode laser-assisted pocket disinfection and systemic doxycycline, in addition to scaling and root planing, has proven to be efficient for treating periodontal pockets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.