Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38646181›Full record

ReviewiScience2024

Machine learning interatomic potential: Bridge the gap between small-scale models and realistic device-scale simulations.

Guanjie Wang, Changrui Wang, Xuanguang Zhang, Zefeng Li, Jian Zhou, Zhimei Sun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A non-enantiopure HChemical science · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guanjie WangSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Changrui WangSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Xuanguang ZhangSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Zefeng LiSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Jian ZhouSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Zhimei SunSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning interatomic potential (MLIP) overcomes the challenges of high computational costs in density-functional theory and the relatively low accuracy in classical large-scale molecular dynamics, facilitating more efficient and precise simulations in materials research and design. In this review, the current state of the four essential stages of MLIP is discussed, including data generation methods, material structure descriptors, six unique machine learning algorithms, and available software. Furthermore, the applications of MLIP in various fields are investigated, notably in phase-change memory materials, structure searching, material properties predicting, and the pre-trained universal models. Eventually, the future perspectives, consisting of standard datasets, transferability, generalization, and trade-off between accuracy and complexity in MLIPs, are reported.

Indexed as

ChemistryComputer scienceMaterials sciencePhysics

Identifiers

PMID38646181
PMCPMC11033164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.