Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38646150›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024

Effect of anticoagulation on the incidence of venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and mortality among hospitalized COVID-19 patients: an updated meta-analysis.

Xinwang Chen, Suyun Zhang, Haiyu Liu, Qianyuan Zhang, Jinghan Chen, Qixian Zheng, Ningjing Guo, Yuanyuan Cai, Qiong Luo, Qian Xu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluation of the IMPROVE-DD score in COVID-19 patients submitted to venous thromboembolism investigation at a hospital in Brazil.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xinwang Chen *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Suyun Zhang *Department of Internal Medicine, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Haiyu Liu *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Qianyuan Zhang *Department of General Medicine, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Jinghan ChenDepartment of Oncology Medicine, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Qixian ZhengDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Ningjing GuoDepartment of Oncology Medicine, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yuanyuan CaiDepartment of General Medicine, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Qiong LuoDepartment of Oncology Medicine, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Qian XuDepartment of Oncology Medicine, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Sheng YangDepartment of Oncology Medicine, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Xiangqi ChenDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Fujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Anticoagulation is crucial for patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to the high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the optimal anticoagulation regimen needs further exploration. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of diverse anticoagulation dosage dosages for COVID-19. Methods: An updated meta-analysis was performed to assess the effect of thromboprophylaxis (standard, intermediate, and therapeutic dose) on the incidence of VTE, mortality and major bleeding among COVID-19 patients. Literature was searched via PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for effect estimates. Results: Nineteen studies involving 25,289 participants without VTE history were included. The mean age of patients was 59.3 years old. About 50.96% were admitted to the intensive care unit. In the pooled analysis, both therapeutic-dose and intermediate-dose anticoagulation did not have a significant advantage in reducing VTE risk over standard dosage (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.58-2.02, and OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.70-1.12, respectively). Similarly, all-cause mortality was not further decreased in either therapeutic-dose group (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.75-1.67) or intermediate-dose group (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 0.83-2.17). While the major bleeding risk was significantly elevated in the therapeutic-dose group (OR = 2.59, 95%CI: 1.87-3.57) as compared with the standard-dose regimen. Compared with intermediate dosage, therapeutic anticoagulation did not reduce consequent VTE risk (OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.52-1.38) and all-cause mortality (OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.60-1.17), but significantly increased major bleeding rate (OR = 2.42, 95% CI: 1.58-3.70). In subgroup analysis of patients older than 65 years, therapeutic anticoagulation significantly lowered the incidence of VTE in comparation comparison with standard thromboprophylaxis, however, at the cost of elevated risk of major bleeding. Conclusion: Our results indicated that for most hospitalized patients with COVID-19, standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation might be the optimal choice. For elderly patients at low risk of bleeding, therapeutic-dose anticoagulation could further reduce VTE risk and should be considered especially when there were other strong risk factors of VTE during hospital stay. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier, CRD42023388429.

Indexed as

anticoagulationCOVID-19prevention and treatmentthromboprophylaxisvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID38646150
PMCPMC11026614
OpenAlexW4393986890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.