Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38646110›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2024

Application of a user experience design approach for an EHR-based clinical decision support system.

Emily Gao, Ilana Radpavar, Emma J Clark, Gery W Ryan, Mindy K Ross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Development of web- and mobile-based shared decision-making tools in the neurological intensive care unit.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily GaoCollege of Letters and Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.
Ilana RadpavarCollege of Letters and Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.
Emma J ClarkDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.
Gery W RyanDepartment of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente, Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA 91101, United States.
Mindy K RossDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7974-4309

Funding

Patient Entered Data for Clinical Decision Support to Personalize Pediatric Asthma ManagementK23HL148502 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ROSS, MINDY K · 2020 to 2024
$980k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL148502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We applied a user experience (UX) design approach to clinical decision support (CDS) tool development for the specific use case of pediatric asthma. Our objective was to understand physicians' workflows, decision-making processes, barriers (ie, pain points), and facilitators to increase usability of the tool. Materials and methods: We used a mixed-methods approach with semi-structured interviews and surveys. The coded interviews were synthesized into physician-user journey maps (ie, visualization of a process to accomplish goals) and personas (ie, user types). Interviews were conducted via video. We developed physician journey maps and user personas informed by their goals, systems interactions, and experiences with pediatric asthma management. Results: The physician end-user personas identified were: efficiency, relationship, and learning. Features of a potential asthma CDS tool sought varied by physician practice type and persona. It was important to the physician end-user that the asthma CDS tool demonstrate value by lowering workflow friction (ie, difficulty or obstacles), improving the environment surrounding physicians and patients, and using it as a teaching tool. Customizability versus standardization were important considerations for uptake. Discussion: Different values and motivations of physicians influence their use and interaction with the EHR and CDS tools. These different perspectives can be captured by applying a UX design approach to the development process. For example, with the importance of customizability, one approach may be to build a core module with variations depending on end-user preference. Conclusion: A UX approach can drive design to help understand physician-users and meet their needs; ultimately with the goal of increased uptake.

Indexed as

asthmaclinical decision supportelectronic health recordimplementation scienceuser centered design

Identifiers

PMID38646110
PMCPMC11032728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.