ArticleResuscitation plus2024
The German Resuscitation Registry - Epidemiological data for out-of-hospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial heterogeneity in risk-adjusted return of spontaneous circulation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the urbanization-adjusted RACA model.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Influence of team size on the efficiency of time-critical ALS interventions in prehospital cardiac arrest - A prospective randomised multicentre simulation study.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Vitabel: A Python Framework for Visualizing and Labelling High-Resolution Physiological Data for Critical Care Machine Learning.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- [Cardiac resuscitation-associated lung edema (CRALE): evaluation of diagnostic and therapeutic approaches by an expert group of the German Cardiac Society].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Article
- Wolf Creek XVIII Part 4: innovations in ECPR technology.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- [Post-Resuscitation care in the intensive care unit].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Review
- Cadiology intensive care in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Circumstances in a young German cohort with sudden cardiac arrest: systematic insights and implications.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025Article
- The urgent need for patients' diagnoses and outcome feedback in Germany's emergency medical services - insights from a web-based survey.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The German Resuscitation Registry was started in 2007 and collects data on out-of-hospital as well as in-hospital cardiac arrest and resuscitation. It has collected more than 400.000 datasets till today. Methods: The German Resuscitation Registry (GRR) is a voluntary quality improvement tool and research tool for out-of-hospital and in-hospital resuscitation as well as in-hospital emergency treatment. It collects data for initial treatment, in-hospital care as well as long-term outcome in an online database. For risk stratification two scores have been developed, published, and implemented. The participants are getting annual and monthly or quarterly reports in addition to the standardized online, 24/7 available analyzing options. An annual public report is published as well. We are reporting on the OHCA annual report of 2022. Results: In 2022 the incidence of CPR started or continued by EMS was 77.6/100.000 inhabitants/year. The mean age was 70.2 years and 66.7% were male bystanders who started CPR in 51.3%. The average response time for the first EMS vehicle to arrive on scene was 6:55 min.In 57.9% of the cases, they had a presumed cardiac cause. The primary outcome, return-of-spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved in 42.1%. Discussion: With its more than 450.000 included datasets, the GRR is an established tool for quality improvement and research in Germany and internationally. The results for the incidence of OHCA and outcome from 2022 are compared to EuReCa TWO data ranging in the upper third of European countries. Furthermore, the GRR has contributed to increasing knowledge of OHCA by conducting and publishing research e.g. on epidemiology, airway management, and medication of OHCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.