Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38646091›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2024

The German Resuscitation Registry - Epidemiological data for out-of-hospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Jan Wnent, Jan-Thorsten Gräsner, Matthias Fischer, Alexandra Ramshorn-Zimmer, Andreas Bohn, Berthold Bein, Stephan Seewald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Post-Resuscitation care in the intensive care unit].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Circumstances in a young German cohort with sudden cardiac arrest: systematic insights and implications.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jan WnentInstitute for Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Jan-Thorsten GräsnerInstitute for Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Matthias FischerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, and Pain Therapy, Alb Fils Kliniken, Göppingen, Germany.
Alexandra Ramshorn-ZimmerDivision for Medical Management, Department for clinical process management, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany.
Andreas BohnCity of Munster Fire Department, Munster, Germany.
Berthold BeinDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
Stephan SeewaldInstitute for Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The German Resuscitation Registry was started in 2007 and collects data on out-of-hospital as well as in-hospital cardiac arrest and resuscitation. It has collected more than 400.000 datasets till today. Methods: The German Resuscitation Registry (GRR) is a voluntary quality improvement tool and research tool for out-of-hospital and in-hospital resuscitation as well as in-hospital emergency treatment. It collects data for initial treatment, in-hospital care as well as long-term outcome in an online database. For risk stratification two scores have been developed, published, and implemented. The participants are getting annual and monthly or quarterly reports in addition to the standardized online, 24/7 available analyzing options. An annual public report is published as well. We are reporting on the OHCA annual report of 2022. Results: In 2022 the incidence of CPR started or continued by EMS was 77.6/100.000 inhabitants/year. The mean age was 70.2 years and 66.7% were male bystanders who started CPR in 51.3%. The average response time for the first EMS vehicle to arrive on scene was 6:55 min.In 57.9% of the cases, they had a presumed cardiac cause. The primary outcome, return-of-spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved in 42.1%. Discussion: With its more than 450.000 included datasets, the GRR is an established tool for quality improvement and research in Germany and internationally. The results for the incidence of OHCA and outcome from 2022 are compared to EuReCa TWO data ranging in the upper third of European countries. Furthermore, the GRR has contributed to increasing knowledge of OHCA by conducting and publishing research e.g. on epidemiology, airway management, and medication of OHCA.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyGerman resuscitation registryIn-Hospital Cardiac ArrestOut-of-hospital cardiac arrestResuscitation

Identifiers

PMID38646091
PMCPMC11031786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.