Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38646086›Full record

ArticleIISE transactions on healthcare systems engineering2024

Mapping the process of ICU care delivery to improve treatment decisions in acute respiratory failure.

Jacqueline M Kruser, Elizabeth M Viglianti, Ruben Mylvaganam, Kristyn A Krolikowski, Rebeca Khorzad, Michael E Detsky, Douglas A Wiegmann, Richard G Wunderink, Jane L Holl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IISE transactions on healthcare systems engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jacqueline M KruserDepartment of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Elizabeth M VigliantiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Ruben MylvaganamDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Kristyn A KrolikowskiCenter for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Rebeca KhorzadArvin LLC Healthcare Quality Improvement, Lake Forest, Illinois, United States of America.
Michael E DetskyDepartment of Medicine, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada.
Douglas A WiegmannDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Richard G WunderinkDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Jane L HollBiological Sciences Division, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

Funding

Improving Risk-Stratification in Patients with Prolonged ICU StaysK23HL157364 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI VIGLIANTI, ELIZABETH MARIE · 2021 to 2025
$913k
CHANGE OF GRANTEE INSTITUTION K23 HL146890 A Systems Approach to Align ICU Care with Patient Treatment GoalsK23HL146890 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KRUSER, JACQUELINE MARIE · 2019 to 2023
$877k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL146890NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL157364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence suggests system-level norms and care processes influence individual patients' medical decisions, including end-of-life decisions for patients with critical illnesses like acute respiratory failure. Yet, little is known about how these processes unfold over the course of a patient's critical illness in the intensive care unit (ICU). Our objective was to map current-state ICU care delivery processes for patients with acute respiratory failure and to identify opportunities to improve the process. We conducted a process mapping study at two academic medical centers, using focus groups and semi-structured interviews. The 70 participants represented 17 distinct roles in ICU care, including interprofessional medical ICU and palliative care clinicians, surrogate decision makers, and patient survivors. Participants refined and endorsed a process map of current-state care delivery for all patients admitted to the ICU with acute respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. The process contains four critical periods for active deliberation about the use of life-sustaining treatments. However, active deliberation steps are inconsistently performed and frequently disrupted, leading to prolongation of life-sustaining treatment by default, without consideration of patients' individual goals and priorities. Interventions to standardize active deliberation in the ICU may improve treatment decisions for ICU patients with acute respiratory failure.

Indexed as

communicationcritical careend-of-life careprocess mappingqualitative researchshared decision making

Identifiers

PMID38646086
PMCPMC11025699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.