ReviewTrauma surgery & acute care open2024
Intraosseous access in the resuscitation of patients with trauma: the good, the bad, the future.
Review in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Intraosseous access in neurological emergencies: a critical narrative review and research framework.Future science OA · 2026Review
- Central venous catheters in prehospital care: Just because we can, does it mean we should?Transfusion · 2026Article
- Adaptive Collaboration Between the Emergency Department and Neonatal Intensive Care to Treat a 16-Month-Old in Sepsis-Related Hemolytic Anemia with a Hemoglobin of 1.7 g/dL: A Case Report.Pediatric reports · 2026Article
- Randomized controlled trial of intraosseous access vs. intravenous access in traumatic hemorrhagic shock: Effects on inflammation, hematopoiesis, and coagulation.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- An observational study of pre-hospital central venous access for patients with haemorrhagic shock due to major trauma.Anaesthesia · 2026Observational
- Does the Injection Site Matter During CPR? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Drug Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Intraosseous vs. intravenous access in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Review
- Contemporary management of traumatic cardiac arrest and peri-arrest states: a narrative review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The timely restoration of lost blood in hemorrhaging patients with trauma, especially those who are hemodynamically unstable, is of utmost importance. While intravenous access has traditionally been considered the primary method for vascular access, intraosseous (IO) access is gaining popularity as an alternative for patients with unsuccessful attempts. Previous studies have highlighted the higher success rate and easier training process associated with IO access compared with peripheral intravenous (PIV) and central intravenous access. However, the effectiveness of IO access in the early aggressive resuscitation of patients remains unclear. This review article aims to comprehensively discuss various aspects of IO access, including its advantages and disadvantages, and explore the existing literature on the clinical outcomes of patients with trauma undergoing resuscitation with IO versus intravenous access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.