Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38645866›Full record

ArticleSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2024

[Clinical Efficacy of Modified Arthroscopic Revision Release of Gluteal Muscle Contracture With Residual Symptoms After Open Surgery].

Kun Chen, Peng Gao, Xiaoxiang Fang, Kexing Tang, Zongchao Li, Zhenhan Deng, Liangjun Li

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kun Chen（ 410018） Department of Orthopedics, Changsha Central Hospital Affiliated of University of South China, Changsha 410018, China.
Peng Gao（ 410018） Department of Orthopedics, Changsha Central Hospital Affiliated of University of South China, Changsha 410018, China.
Xiaoxiang Fang（ 410018） Department of Orthopedics, Changsha Central Hospital Affiliated of University of South China, Changsha 410018, China.
Kexing Tang（ 410018） Department of Orthopedics, Changsha Central Hospital Affiliated of University of South China, Changsha 410018, China.
Zongchao Li（ 410018） Department of Orthopedics, Changsha Central Hospital Affiliated of University of South China, Changsha 410018, China.
Zhenhan Deng（ 410018） Department of Orthopedics, Changsha Central Hospital Affiliated of University of South China, Changsha 410018, China.
Liangjun Li（ 410018） Department of Orthopedics, Changsha Central Hospital Affiliated of University of South China, Changsha 410018, China.
Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of modified arthroscopic revision release for patients who have gluteal muscle contracture and who have poor outcomes after traditional open surgery. Methods: The data of patients who underwent modified arthroscopic revision release for residual symptoms of gluteal muscle contracture after traditional open surgery were retrospectively collected and analyzed. All subjects underwent the procedure between December 2015 and December 2022. The surgical efficacy was assessed by evaluating improvements in specific symptoms, including bilateral lower extremity inequality, hip internal rotation and adduction mobility, squatting with both knees pressed together, and the ability to cross one's legs in supine position, as well as the preoperative and postoperative results for the gluteal muscle contracture functionality scale. Paired Results: A total of 36 patients were followed up systematically, with the mean follow-up period being (22.4±4.9) months. All patients had significantly higher scores for assessment with the gluteal muscle contracture functionality scale at the last follow-up than their preoperative assessment results, showing an increase from the preoperative scores of 40.2±5.5 to 78.4±4.9 ( Conclusion: Modified arthroscopic revision release of gluteus muscle contracture is suitable for cases with poor outcomes after conventional open surgery.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyContractureButtocksFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeArthroscopyGluteal muscle contractureRevision release surgery

Identifiers

PMID38645866
PMCPMC11026877
OpenAlexW4395009541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.