Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38645806›Full record

ArticleCentral European journal of urology2024

Assessment of the incidence and risk factors of postoperative urosepsis in patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Krystian Kaczmarek, Marta Jankowska, Jakub Kalembkiewicz, Jakub Kienitz, Ositadima Chukwu, Artur Lemiński, Marcin Słojewski

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Central European journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Krystian KaczmarekDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Marta JankowskaDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Jakub KalembkiewiczDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Jakub KienitzDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Ositadima ChukwuDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Artur LemińskiDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Marcin SłojewskiDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Pomeranian Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) is an approved, minimally invasive, low-risk procedure for urolithiasis treatment. However, some patients may develop urinary tract infection (UTI) post-procedure, eventually leading to urosepsis. Determining the predictors of infection after URSL would help identify patients at a high risk of urosepsis, thereby enabling the early implementation of effective treatment. Therefore, we aimed to establish the incidence and predictors of urosepsis after URSL. Material and methods: We assessed 231 patients who underwent URSL using a holmium laser. The incidence of urosepsis during the 30-day post-treatment period was analysed, and potential predictors of urosepsis, including patient characteristics and individual clinical factors, were examined. Results: Statistical analysis revealed that 16.88% of patients had a confirmed positive urine culture before the procedure. Post-procedure urosepsis occurred in 4.76% of patients. Univariable analysis revealed that 3 factors were significantly associated with the risk of postoperative urosepsis: double-J stent insertion before URSL, pre-operative positive urine culture, and MDR pathogen found preoperatively. In multivariable analysis, only positive urine culture remained significantly associated with the risk of urosepsis after URSL. Conclusions: Patients with positive urine culture before URSL are at significantly higher risk of urosepsis in the postoperative period. Hence, urine culture should be routinely performed before planned endoscopic urolithiasis treatment.

Indexed as

Hopostoperative complicationsureteroscopic lithotripsyurinary tract infectionurolithiasisurosepsisURSLYAG laser

Identifiers

PMID38645806
PMCPMC11032028
OpenAlexW4392398143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.