Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38645764›Full record

ArticlePatterns (New York, N.Y.)2024

A comprehensive benchmark for COVID-19 predictive modeling using electronic health records in intensive care.

Junyi Gao, Yinghao Zhu, Wenqing Wang, Zixiang Wang, Guiying Dong, Wen Tang, Hao Wang, Yasha Wang, Ewen M Harrison, Liantao Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Spatio-temporal epidemic forecasting with graph-based transformer.International journal of health geographics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. 2023 Beijing Health Data Science Summit.Health data science · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Junyi GaoCentre for Medical Informatics, University of Edinburgh, EH16 4UX Edinburgh, UK.
Yinghao ZhuPeking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Wenqing WangPeking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Zixiang WangPeking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Guiying DongPeking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
Wen TangPeking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Hao WangPeking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Yasha WangPeking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Ewen M HarrisonCentre for Medical Informatics, University of Edinburgh, EH16 4UX Edinburgh, UK.
Liantao MaPeking University, Beijing 100871, China.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for predictive deep-learning models in health care. However, practical prediction task design, fair comparison, and model selection for clinical applications remain a challenge. To address this, we introduce and evaluate two new prediction tasks-outcome-specific length-of-stay and early-mortality prediction for COVID-19 patients in intensive care-which better reflect clinical realities. We developed evaluation metrics, model adaptation designs, and open-source data preprocessing pipelines for these tasks while also evaluating 18 predictive models, including clinical scoring methods and traditional machine-learning, basic deep-learning, and advanced deep-learning models, tailored for electronic health record (EHR) data. Benchmarking results from two real-world COVID-19 EHR datasets are provided, and all results and trained models have been released on an online platform for use by clinicians and researchers. Our efforts contribute to the advancement of deep-learning and machine-learning research in pandemic predictive modeling.

Indexed as

benchmarkCOVID-19deep learningEHRelectronic health recordICUintensive care unitlength-of-stay predictionmortality prediction

Identifiers

PMID38645764
PMCPMC11026964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.