Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38645734›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine2024

The Use of Telemedicine by US Nephrologists for In-Center Hemodialysis Care During the Pandemic: An Analysis of National Medicare Claims.

Jingbo Niu, Omar Rosales, Abiodun Oluyomi, Susie Q Lew, Wolfgang C Winkelmayer, Glenn M Chertow, Kevin F Erickson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Nephrologist Perspectives on Using Telemedicine During In-Center Hemodialysis: A Qualitative Study.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jingbo NiuSection of Nephrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Omar RosalesCenter for Epidemiology and Population Health, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Abiodun OluyomiCenter for Epidemiology and Population Health, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Susie Q LewDivision of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Wolfgang C WinkelmayerSection of Nephrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Glenn M ChertowDivision of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Kevin F EricksonSection of Nephrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Baylor College of Medicine · USGeorge Washington University · USStanford University · US

Funding

The Effects Of Telemedicine on Health Outcomes, Costs, and Perceptions of Care Delivery in In-Center HemodialysisR01DK128209 · NIDDK · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ERICKSON, KEVIN · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK128209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale & Objective: Because of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the US government issued emergency waivers in March 2020 that removed regulatory barriers around the use of telemedicine. For the first time, nephrologists were reimbursed for telemedicine care delivered during in-center hemodialysis. We examined the use of telemedicine for in-center hemodialysis during the first 16 months of the pandemic. Study Design: We ascertained telemedicine modifiers on nephrologist claims. We used multivariable regression to examine time trends and patient, dialysis facility, and geographic correlates of telemedicine use. We also examined whether the estimated effects of predictors of telemedicine use changed over time. Setting & Participants: US Medicare beneficiaries receiving in-center hemodialysis between March 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021. Exposures: Patient, geographic, and dialysis facility characteristics. Outcomes: The use of telehealth for in-center hemodialysis care. Analytic Approach: Retrospective cohort analysis. Results: Among 267,434 Medicare beneficiaries identified, the reported use of telemedicine peaked at 9% of patient-months in April 2020 and declined to 2% of patient-months by June 2021. Telemedicine use varied geographically and was more common in areas that were remote and socioeconomically disadvantaged. Patients were more likely to receive care by telemedicine in areas with higher incidence of COVID-19, although the predictive value of COVID-19 diminished later in the pandemic. Patients were more likely to receive care using telemedicine if they were at facilities with more staff, and the use of telemedicine varied by facility ownership type. Limitations: Limited reporting of telemedicine on claims could lead to underestimation of its use. Reported telemedicine use was higher in an analysis designed to address this limitation by focusing on patients whose physicians used telemedicine at least once during the pandemic. Conclusions: Some US nephrologists continued to use telemedicine for in-center hemodialysis throughout the pandemic, even as the association between COVID-19 incidence and telemedicine use diminished over time. These findings highlight unique challenges and opportunities to the future use of telemedicine in dialysis care.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemichemodialysisnephrologisttelemedicinevariation

Identifiers

PMID38645734
PMCPMC11026969
OpenAlexW4392145589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.