Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38645719›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2024

Single-cell type annotation with deep learning in 265 cell types for humans.

Sherry Dong, Kaiwen Deng, Xiuzhen Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Deep learning based deconvolution methods: A systematic review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sherry DongSkyline High School, Ann Arbor, MI 48103, United States.
Kaiwen DengDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States.
Xiuzhen HuangNational AI Campus and Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA 90069, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0498-3131

Funding

AIM-AHEAD Coordinating Center - All Four CoresOT2OD032581 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI Paul Avillach, Bettina M. Beech · 2021 to 2026
$168.7M
NIH HHS OT2 OD032581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Annotating cell types is a challenging yet essential task in analyzing single-cell RNA sequencing data. However, due to the lack of a gold standard, it is difficult to evaluate the algorithms fairly and an overfitting algorithm may be favored in benchmarks. To address this challenge, we developed a deep learning-based single-cell type prediction tool that assigns the cell type to 265 different cell types for humans, based on data from approximately five million cells. Results: We achieved a median area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.93 when evaluated across datasets. We found that inconsistent labeling in the existing database generated by different labs contributed to the mistakes of the model. Therefore, we used cell ontology to correct the annotations and retrained the model, which resulted in 0.971 median AUC. Our study reveals a limiting factor of the accuracy one may achieve with the current database annotation and points to the solutions towards an algorithm-based correction of the gold standard for future automated cell annotation approaches. Availability and implementation: The code is available at: https://github.com/SherrySDong/Hierarchical-Correction-Improves-Automated-Single-cell-Type-Annotation. Data used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S1 and are retrievable at the CZI database.

Identifiers

PMID38645719
PMCPMC11031354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.