ArticleBioinformatics advances2024
Single-cell type annotation with deep learning in 265 cell types for humans.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hierarchical classification of immune cell transcriptomes at population-scale.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Deep learning based deconvolution methods: A systematic review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Tumor heterogeneity assessment using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq): applications in lung cancer for diagnosis and treatment.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Annotating cell types is a challenging yet essential task in analyzing single-cell RNA sequencing data. However, due to the lack of a gold standard, it is difficult to evaluate the algorithms fairly and an overfitting algorithm may be favored in benchmarks. To address this challenge, we developed a deep learning-based single-cell type prediction tool that assigns the cell type to 265 different cell types for humans, based on data from approximately five million cells. Results: We achieved a median area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.93 when evaluated across datasets. We found that inconsistent labeling in the existing database generated by different labs contributed to the mistakes of the model. Therefore, we used cell ontology to correct the annotations and retrained the model, which resulted in 0.971 median AUC. Our study reveals a limiting factor of the accuracy one may achieve with the current database annotation and points to the solutions towards an algorithm-based correction of the gold standard for future automated cell annotation approaches. Availability and implementation: The code is available at: https://github.com/SherrySDong/Hierarchical-Correction-Improves-Automated-Single-cell-Type-Annotation. Data used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S1 and are retrievable at the CZI database.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.