Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38645717›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2024

Adjusting for covariates and assessing modeling fitness in machine learning using MUVR2.

Yingxiao Yan, Tessa Schillemans, Viktor Skantze, Carl Brunius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yingxiao YanDepartment of Life Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9196-7326
Tessa SchillemansCardiovascular and Nutritional Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Viktor SkantzeFraunhofer-Chalmers Research Centre for Industrial Mathematics, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1350-1165
Carl BruniusDepartment of Life Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3957-870X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Machine learning (ML) methods are frequently used in Omics research to examine associations between molecular data and for example exposures and health conditions. ML is also used for feature selection to facilitate biological interpretation. Our previous MUVR algorithm was shown to generate predictions and variable selections at state-of-the-art performance. However, a general framework for assessing modeling fitness is still lacking. In addition, enabling to adjust for covariates is a highly desired, but largely lacking trait in ML. We aimed to address these issues in the new MUVR2 framework. Results: The MUVR2 algorithm was developed to include the regularized regression framework elastic net in addition to partial least squares and random forest modeling. Compared with other cross-validation strategies, MUVR2 consistently showed state-of-the-art performance, including variable selection, while minimizing overfitting. Testing on simulated and real-world data, we also showed that MUVR2 allows for the adjustment for covariates using elastic net modeling, but not using partial least squares or random forest. Availability and implementation: Algorithms, data, scripts, and a tutorial are open source under GPL-3 license and available in the

Identifiers

PMID38645717
PMCPMC11031361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.