Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38645436›Full record

ArticleThe American statistician2024

Enhanced Inference for Finite Population Sampling-Based Prevalence Estimation with Misclassification Errors.

Lin Ge, Yuzi Zhang, Lance A Waller, Robert H Lyles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American statistician, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lin GeDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Yuzi ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Lance A WallerDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.
Robert H LylesDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.

Funding

Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
Virology and Molecular Biomarkers CoreP30AI050409 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Ann M Chahroudi, Colleen F Kelley · 2002 to 2026
$74.0M
Registering Cancer Recurrences in the Georgia Cancer RegistryR01CA234538 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LASH, TIMOTHY L., WARD, KEVIN C · 2019 to 2024
$2.8M
Refined Capture-Recapture Methods for Surveilling Cancer RecurrenceR01CA266574 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LYLES, ROBERT H, WALLER, LANCE A · 2022 to 2025
$1.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378NCI NIH HHS R01 CA234538NCI NIH HHS R01 CA266574NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidemiologic screening programs often make use of tests with small, but non-zero probabilities of misdiagnosis. In this article, we assume the target population is finite with a fixed number of true cases, and that we apply an imperfect test with known sensitivity and specificity to a sample of individuals from the population. In this setting, we propose an enhanced inferential approach for use in conjunction with sampling-based bias-corrected prevalence estimation. While ignoring the finite nature of the population can yield markedly conservative estimates, direct application of a standard finite population correction (FPC) conversely leads to underestimation of variance. We uncover a way to leverage the typical FPC indirectly toward valid statistical inference. In particular, we derive a readily estimable extra variance component induced by misclassification in this specific but arguably common diagnostic testing scenario. Our approach yields a standard error estimate that properly captures the sampling variability of the usual bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator of disease prevalence. Finally, we develop an adapted Bayesian credible interval for the true prevalence that offers improved frequentist properties (i.e., coverage and width) relative to a Wald-type confidence interval. We report the simulation results to demonstrate the enhanced performance of the proposed inferential methods.

Indexed as

bias correctioncredible intervalfinite population correctionrandom samplingsensitivityspecificity

Identifiers

PMID38645436
PMCPMC11027951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.