ArticlePattern recognition2024
Improving Image Segmentation with Contextual and Structural Similarity.
Article in Pattern recognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Dynamic Representation and Multi-Priors for Transnasal Intubation via Visual Foundation Model.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep ensemble learning-driven fully automated multi-structure segmentation for precision craniomaxillofacial surgery.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning models for medical image segmentation are usually trained with voxel-wise losses, e.g., cross-entropy loss, focusing on unary supervision without considering inter-voxel relationships. This oversight potentially leads to semantically inconsistent predictions. Here, we propose a contextual similarity loss (CSL) and a structural similarity loss (SSL) to explicitly and efficiently incorporate inter-voxel relationships for improved performance. The CSL promotes consistency in predicted object categories for each image sub-region compared to ground truth. The SSL enforces compatibility between the predictions of voxel pairs by computing pair-wise distances between them, ensuring that voxels of the same class are close together whereas those from different classes are separated by a wide margin in the distribution space. The effectiveness of the CSL and SSL is evaluated using a clinical cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) dataset of patients with various craniomaxillofacial (CMF) deformities and a public pancreas dataset. Experimental results show that the CSL and SSL outperform state-of-the-art regional loss functions in preserving segmentation semantics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.