Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38645389›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2024

Defense strategies and associated phytohormonal regulation in

Jamin Ali, Adil Tonğa, Tarikul Islam, Sajad Mir, Mohammad Mukarram, Alena Sliacka Konôpková, Rizhao Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
23.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Discovery of a defence-response gene forFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 8 countries.

Jamin AliCollege of Plant Protection, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Adil TonğaEntomology Department, Diyarbakır Plant Protection Research Institute, Diyarbakir, Türkiye.
Tarikul IslamDepartment of Entomology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Sajad MirEntomology Section, Sher-E-Kashmir University of Agricultural Science and Technology, Kashmir, India.
Mohammad MukarramFood and Plant Biology Group, Department of Plant Biology, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Alena Sliacka KonôpkováDepartment of Integrated Forest and Landscape Protection, Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia.
Rizhao ChenCollege of Plant Protection, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
Jilin Agricultural University · CNDiyarbakır Askeri Hastanesi · TRRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USSher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir · INTechnical University of Zvolen · SKUniversidad de la República · UY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants have evolved distinct defense strategies in response to a diverse range of chewing and sucking insect herbivory. While chewing insect herbivores, exemplified by caterpillars and beetles, cause visible tissue damage and induce jasmonic acid (JA)-mediated defense responses, sucking insects, such as aphids and whiteflies, delicately tap into the phloem sap and elicit salicylic acid (SA)-mediated defense responses. This review aims to highlight the specificity of defense strategies in

Indexed as

Brassicachewing herbivoresdefense responsesherbivore feeding patternsap-sucking

Identifiers

PMID38645389
PMCPMC11026728
OpenAlexW4393984613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.