Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38645276›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2024

Restoring cellular copper homeostasis in Alzheimer disease: a novel peptide shuttle is internalized by an ATP-dependent endocytosis pathway involving Rab5- and Rab14-endosomes.

Michael Okafor, Olivia Champomier, Laurent Raibaut, Sebahat Ozkan, Naima El Kholti, Stéphane Ory, Sylvette Chasserot-Golaz, Stéphane Gasman, Christelle Hureau, Peter Faller and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michael OkaforInstitut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UPR3212, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Olivia ChampomierInstitut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UPR3212, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Laurent RaibautInstitut de Chimie-UMR7177, Université de Strasbourg, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Strasbourg, France.
Sebahat OzkanInstitut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UPR3212, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Naima El KholtiInstitut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UPR3212, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Stéphane OryInstitut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UPR3212, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Sylvette Chasserot-GolazInstitut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UPR3212, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Stéphane GasmanInstitut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UPR3212, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Christelle HureauLaboratoire de Chimie de Coordination, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UPR8241, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Peter Faller *Institut de Chimie-UMR7177, Université de Strasbourg, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Strasbourg, France.
Nicolas Vitale *Institut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UPR3212, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Institut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives · FRInstitut de Chimie de Strasbourg · FRInstitut Universitaire de France · FRUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CPPs, or Cell-Penetrating Peptides, offer invaluable utility in disease treatment due to their ability to transport various therapeutic molecules across cellular membranes. Their unique characteristics, such as biocompatibility and low immunogenicity, make them ideal candidates for delivering drugs, genes, or imaging agents directly into cells. This targeted delivery enhances treatment efficacy while minimizing systemic side effects. CPPs exhibit versatility, crossing biological barriers and reaching intracellular targets that conventional drugs struggle to access. This capability holds promise in treating a wide array of diseases, including cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, and infectious diseases, offering a potent avenue for innovative and targeted therapies, yet their precise mechanism of cell entry is far from being fully understood. In order to correct Cu dysregulation found in various pathologies such as Alzheimer disease, we have recently conceived a peptide Cu(II) shuttle, based on the αR5W4 CPP, which, when bound to Cu(II), is able to readily enter a neurosecretory cell model, and release bioavailable Cu in cells. Furthermore, this shuttle has the capacity to protect cells in culture against oxidative stress-induced damage which occurs when Cu binds to the Aβ peptide. The aim of this study was therefore to characterize the cell entry route used by this shuttle and determine in which compartment Cu is released. Pharmacological treatments, siRNA silencing and colocalization experiments with GFP-Rab fusion proteins, indicate that the shuttle is internalized by an ATP-dependent endocytosis pathway involving both Rab5 and Rab14 endosomes route and suggest an early release of Cu from the shuttle.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasecopper homeostasisendocytosisendolysosomesrab GTPase

Identifiers

PMID38645276
PMCPMC11026709
OpenAlexW4393987213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.