ArticleResearch square2024
Recurrent Retinal Detachment in Stickler Syndrome.
Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To assess clinical factors leading to recurrent retinal detachment (RD) and characteristics of recurrence in patients with Stickler Syndrome. Methods: Retrospective case series study of patients with clinical diagnosis of Stickler Syndrome who underwent rhegmatogenous RD repair. Recurrent RD after initial surgery was categorized as "early" if the recurrence was within 1 year or "late" if greater than 1 year. Results: Thirty eyes from 22 patients underwent rhegmatogenous RD repair. For initial repair, 13 eyes underwent pars plana vitrectomy combined with scleral buckling (PPV/SB), 16 eyes underwent primary scleral buckling (SB), and 1 eye underwent pneumatic retinopexy (PnR). Recurrent RD occurred in 6 (46%) PPV/SB eyes (5 early and 1 late), 10 (63%) SB eyes (3 early and 7 late), and 0 (0%) PnR eyes (p = 0.61). PPV/SB was preferred for eyes presenting with total detachment (82%), giant retinal tears (100%), and proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) (80%). For eyes with early recurrent RD, 6 (75%) developed PVR leading to recurrence. For eyes with late recurrent RD, 7 (87.5%) developed a new retinal break leading to recurrence, including 4 with a break posterior to the buckle indentation apex. At last follow-up, median LogMAR visual acuity was 0.68 for eyes with recurrent RD compared to 0.29 for eyes without recurrence (p = 0.27). Conclusions: Early recurrent RD was mostly caused by PVR, while late recurrent RD was mostly due to new retinal breaks. Eyes with seemingly uncomplicated rhegmatogenous RD repair with primary SB remained at high risk for late re-detachment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.