ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Leveraging a Comprehensive Unbiased RNAseq Database Uncovers New Human Monocyte-Derived Macrophage Subtypes Within Commonly Employed In Vitro Polarization Methods.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Macrophages are pivotal innate immune cells which exhibit high phenotypic plasticity and can exist in different polarization states dependent on exposure to external stimuli. Numerous methods have been employed to simulate macrophage polarization states to test their function in vitro. However, limited research has explored whether these polarization methods yield comparable populations beyond key gene, cytokine, and cell surface marker expression. Here, we employ an unbiased comprehensive analysis using data organized through the all RNA-seq and ChIP-seq sample and signature search (ARCHS4) database, which compiles all RNAseq data deposited into the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA). In silico analyses were carried out demonstrating that commonly employed macrophage polarization methods generate distinct macrophage subsets that remained undescribed until now. Our analyses confirm existing knowledge on macrophage polarization, while revealing nuanced differences between M2a and M2c subpopulations, suggesting non-interchangeable stimuli for M2a polarization. Furthermore, we identify divergent gene expression patterns in M1 macrophages following standard polarization protocols, indicating significant subset distinctions. Consequently, equivalence cannot be assumed among polarization regimens for in vitro macrophage studies, particularly in simulating diverse pathogen responses.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.