ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2024
Nonparametric two-sample tests of high dimensional mean vectors via random integration.
Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Testing the equality of the means in two samples is a fundamental statistical inferential problem. Most of the existing methods are based on the sum-of-squares or supremum statistics. They are possibly powerful in some situations, but not in others, and they do not work in a unified way. Using random integration of the difference, we develop a framework that includes and extends many existing methods, especially in high-dimensional settings, without restricting the same covariance matrices or sparsity. Under a general multivariate model, we can derive the asymptotic properties of the proposed test statistic without specifying a relationship between the data dimension and sample size explicitly. Specifically, the new framework allows us to better understand the test's properties and select a powerful procedure accordingly. For example, we prove that our proposed test can achieve the power of 1 when nonzero signals in the true mean differences are weakly dense with nearly the same sign. In addition, we delineate the conditions under which the asymptotic relative Pitman efficiency of our proposed test to its competitor is greater than or equal to 1. Extensive numerical studies and a real data example demonstrate the potential of our proposed test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.