Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38644887›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Restriction modification systems in archaea: A panoramic outlook.

Pallavi Gulati, Ashish Singh, Sandeep Patra, Shreyas Bhat, Anil Verma

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Nitrosarchaeum haohaiensis sp. Nov. CL1Environmental microbiology reports · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pallavi GulatiDepartment of Microbiology, Ram Lal Anand College, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India.
Ashish SinghDepartment of Microbiology, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India.
Sandeep PatraDepartment of Microbiology, Ram Lal Anand College, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India.
Shreyas BhatDepartment of Microbiology, Ram Lal Anand College, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India.
Anil VermaDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA-15213, USA.
University of Delhi · INUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restriction modification (RM) systems are one of the ubiquitous yet primitive defense responses employed by bacteria and archaea with the primary role of safeguarding themselves against invading bacteriophages. Protection of the host occurs by the cleavage of the invading foreign DNA via restriction endonucleases with concomitant methylation of host DNA with the aid of a methyltransferase counterpart. RM systems have been extensively studied in bacteria, however, in the case of archaea there are limited reports of RM enzymes that are investigated to date owing to their inhospitable growth demands. This review aims to broaden the knowledge about what is known about the diversity of RM systems in archaea and encapsulate the current knowledge on restriction and modification enzymes characterized in archaea so far and the role of RM systems in the milieu of archaeal biology.

Indexed as

ArchaeaDefense responseDNA methylationEndonucleaseMethyltransferaseRestriction-modification system

Identifiers

PMID38644887
PMCPMC11033074
OpenAlexW4392452992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.