Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38644850›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Surrogate metamodels from digital image correlation for testing high-performance composite vessels.

Javier Pisonero, Manuel Rodríguez-Martín, Jose G Fueyo, Diego González-Aguilera, Roberto García-Martín

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Javier PisoneroDepartment of Cartographic and Land Engineering, Higher Polytechnic School of Ávila, Universidad de Salamanca, 05003, Ávila, Spain.
Manuel Rodríguez-MartínDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Higher Polytechnic School of Zamora, Universidad de Salamanca, 49022, Zamora, Spain.
Jose G FueyoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Higher Polytechnic School of Zamora, Universidad de Salamanca, 49022, Zamora, Spain.
Diego González-AguileraDepartment of Cartographic and Land Engineering, Higher Polytechnic School of Ávila, Universidad de Salamanca, 05003, Ávila, Spain.
Roberto García-MartínDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Higher Polytechnic School of Zamora, Universidad de Salamanca, 49022, Zamora, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, a workflow has been developed for the generation of surrogate metamodels to predict and evaluate failure with a confidence above 95 % in initial service conditions of high-performance cylindrical vessels manufactured in composites by Roll Wrapping technology. Currently, there is no specific testing standardization for this type of vessel and to fill this gap probabilistic numerical models were developed, performed by the Finite Element Method, fed with the material characteristics obtained experimentally by 2D digital image correlation from flat specimens. From the initial numerical model, a surrogate metamodel was generated by stochastic approximations. Once the metamodels were obtained by robust engineering, an experimental ring-ring tensile test was developed under service conditions and deformations were measured by high-precision 3D digital image correlation. Parametric and robust tests showed that the results of the metamodel did not show statistically significant differences, with errors in the rupture part of less than 2 % with respect to the results obtained in the test, being proposed as a basis for new test procedures.

Indexed as

CompositesDigital image correlation (DIC)Finite element method (FEM)Reliability engineeringTestingVessels

Identifiers

PMID38644850
PMCPMC11033147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.