Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38644849›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

In-service teacher trainees experience with and preference for online learning environments during Covid-19 pandemic.

Hailay Tesfay Gebremariam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hailay Tesfay GebremariamDepartment of Ethiopian Languages and Literature (Amharic), College of Social Science and Humanities, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has forced the educational sector to quickly adapt to the crisis and shift to online learning environments (OLEs). Therefore, a critical area for research is assessing the readiness of teachers in terms of their familiarity and preference for OLEs. In this study, we aimed to improve the experience and preference of in-service teacher trainees with OLEs during the Covid-19 pandemic in Ethiopia. To achieve this goal, questionnaires were used to gather data from in-service teacher trainees. Descriptive and inferential statistical methods, including exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Pearson correlation, and one-way ANOVA, were used to analyze the data and determine the participants' opinions and experiences with OLEs. The results showed that while in-service teacher trainees had less experience in knowledge and skills compared to cooperation and interaction, they preferred online learning platforms over online learning strategies. Additionally, correlations were found between cooperation and interaction, knowledge and skills; cooperation and interaction, online learning platforms; cooperation and interaction, online learning strategies; and online learning platforms and online learning strategies. Interestingly, no statistically significant correlation was found between knowledge and skills and online learning platforms. In conclusion, Ethiopian in-service teacher trainees favored online learning platforms over traditional online learning strategies, despite having less experience in knowledge and skills. Further research is needed to explore the experiences and preferences of in-service teacher trainees in various ecological aspects.

Indexed as

Covid-19 pandemicIn-service teacher traineesOnline learning environmentsTeacher trainees' experienceTeacher trainees preference

Identifiers

PMID38644849
PMCPMC11031835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.