Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38644813›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Spatial-temporal characteristics analysis and ecological environment quality evaluation of forest health care bases in Yunnan, Guizhou and Sichuan provinces.

Wei Li, Ji Jian, Ke Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wei LiChengdu University of Technology, College of Geography and Planning, Chengdu, 610059, China.
Ji JianChengdu University of Technology, College of Geography and Planning, Chengdu, 610059, China.
Ke LuZhejiang University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Hangzhou, 310018, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the forest health care in China is still in the early stage of development, the construction standards of forest health care base are not unified yet, resulting in large differences in the evaluation criterion for the ecological environment of forest health care bases. So, it is urgent to develop a new forest health care ecological environment quality assessment method. Yunnan, Guizhou and Sichuan provinces of China were selected as the study area, the previous 6 batches of 165 national forest health care pilot construction bases were selected as the main data source. This study explored the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of forest health care bases in the study area using standard deviation ellipses, kernel density estimation method and cold and hot spot analysis. Furthermore, this study evaluated the ecological environment quality of the forest health care bases with a new ecological environment quality evaluation index model, which assembled Fraction Vegetation Coverage (FVC), Wetness (WET), Evapotranspiration (ET), Land Surface Temperature (LST) and Normalized Difference Bare Soil Index (NDBSI). The results are as follows: (1) the forest health bases in the study area are mainly located by the east of the Hu Line with a northeast-southwest distribution direction characteristics, and gradually expanded into a shape of "high in the east and low in the west, multi-point development". (2) the area with ecological environment quality in excellent, good and medium grade accounts for about 87.73 % in the study area, indicating that most of the study area is suitable for the construction of forest health care base. These results can provide a practical guidance for the further rational layout and balanced development of forest health care bases in the study area.

Indexed as

Ecological environment quality assessmentForest health care baseSpatial-temporal distribution characteristicsSuitability studyYunnan, Guizhou and Sichuan provinces

Identifiers

PMID38644813
PMCPMC11031837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.