ArticleRecent advances in inflammation & allergy drug discovery2024
A Novel Detection of Cerebrovascular Disease using Multimodal Medical Image Fusion.
Article in Recent advances in inflammation & allergy drug discovery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiseases are medical situations that are allied with specific signs and symptoms. A disease may be instigated by internal dysfunction or external factors like pathogens. Cerebrovascular disease can progress from diverse causes, comprising thrombosis, atherosclerosis, cerebral venous thrombosis, or embolic arterial blood clot.
objectiveIn this paper, authors have proposed a robust framework for the detection of cerebrovascular diseases employing two different proposals which were validated by use of other datasets.
methodsIn proposed model 1, the Discrete Fourier transform is used for the fusion of CT and MR images which was classified them using machine learning techniques and pre-trained models while in proposed model 2, the cascaded model was proposed. The performance evaluation parameters like accuracy and losses were evaluated.
results92% accuracy was obtained using Support Vector Machine using Gray Level Difference Statistics and Shape features with Principal Component Analysis as a feature selection technique while Inception V3 resulted in 95.6% accuracy while the cascaded model resulted in 96.21% accuracy.
conclusionThe cascaded model is later validated on other datasets which results in 0.11% and 0.14% accuracy improvement over TCIA and BRaTS datasets respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.