ArticleBMC biology2024
Fast and accurate variant identification tool for sequencing-based studies.
Article in BMC biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insertion sequence elements associated with Staphylococcus epidermidis evolution in persistent orthopaedic device-related infections.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Membrane changes during syntrophic interactions of an archaeal-bacterial coculture.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- X-Mapper: fast and accurate sequence alignment via gapped x-mers.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate identification of genetic variants, such as point mutations and insertions/deletions (indels), is crucial for various genetic studies into epidemic tracking, population genetics, and disease diagnosis. Genetic studies into microbiomes often require processing numerous sequencing datasets, necessitating variant identifiers with high speed, accuracy, and robustness.
resultsWe present QuickVariants, a bioinformatics tool that effectively summarizes variant information from read alignments and identifies variants. When tested on diverse bacterial sequencing data, QuickVariants demonstrates a ninefold higher median speed than bcftools, a widely used variant identifier, with higher accuracy in identifying both point mutations and indels. This accuracy extends to variant identification in virus samples, including SARS-CoV-2, particularly with significantly fewer false negative indels than bcftools. The high accuracy of QuickVariants is further demonstrated by its detection of a greater number of Omicron-specific indels (5 versus 0) and point mutations (61 versus 48-54) than bcftools in sewage metagenomes predominated by Omicron variants. Much of the reduced accuracy of bcftools was attributable to its misinterpretation of indels, often producing false negative indels and false positive point mutations at the same locations.
conclusionsWe introduce QuickVariants, a fast, accurate, and robust bioinformatics tool designed for identifying genetic variants for microbial studies. QuickVariants is available at https://github.com/caozhichongchong/QuickVariants .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.