Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38644496›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2024

Fast and accurate variant identification tool for sequencing-based studies.

Jeffry M Gaston, Eric J Alm, An-Ni Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeffry M Gaston *Google, Cambridge, USA.
Eric J AlmDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.
An-Ni Zhang *Department of Biological Engineering, Center for Microbiome Informatics and Therapeutics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA. caozhichongchong@gmail.com.

Funding

Massachusetts Institute of Technology 6934500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate identification of genetic variants, such as point mutations and insertions/deletions (indels), is crucial for various genetic studies into epidemic tracking, population genetics, and disease diagnosis. Genetic studies into microbiomes often require processing numerous sequencing datasets, necessitating variant identifiers with high speed, accuracy, and robustness.

resultsWe present QuickVariants, a bioinformatics tool that effectively summarizes variant information from read alignments and identifies variants. When tested on diverse bacterial sequencing data, QuickVariants demonstrates a ninefold higher median speed than bcftools, a widely used variant identifier, with higher accuracy in identifying both point mutations and indels. This accuracy extends to variant identification in virus samples, including SARS-CoV-2, particularly with significantly fewer false negative indels than bcftools. The high accuracy of QuickVariants is further demonstrated by its detection of a greater number of Omicron-specific indels (5 versus 0) and point mutations (61 versus 48-54) than bcftools in sewage metagenomes predominated by Omicron variants. Much of the reduced accuracy of bcftools was attributable to its misinterpretation of indels, often producing false negative indels and false positive point mutations at the same locations.

conclusionsWe introduce QuickVariants, a fast, accurate, and robust bioinformatics tool designed for identifying genetic variants for microbial studies. QuickVariants is available at https://github.com/caozhichongchong/QuickVariants .

Indexed as

INDEL MutationSARS-CoV-2Computational BiologyCOVID-19Genetic VariationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPoint MutationSequence Analysis, DNASoftwareBioinformaticsGenetic variantsMicrobiomeSARS-CoV-2Variant identification

Identifiers

PMID38644496
PMCPMC11034086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.