Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38644493›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

School health promotion and fruit and vegetable consumption in secondary schools: a repeated cross-sectional multilevel study.

Lisanne Vonk, Iris Eekhout, Tim Huijts, Mark Levels, Maria W J Jansen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lisanne VonkAcademic Collaborative Center for Public Health Limburg, Public Health Service South Limburg, 6400 AA, Heerlen, P.O. Box 33, the Netherlands. l.vonk@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Iris EekhoutExpertise Center Child Health, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), 2301 DA, Leiden, P.O. Box 3005, the Netherlands.
Tim HuijtsResearch Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA), School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, Postbus 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Mark LevelsResearch Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA), School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, Postbus 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Maria W J JansenAcademic Collaborative Center for Public Health Limburg, Public Health Service South Limburg, 6400 AA, Heerlen, P.O. Box 33, the Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLGGD Zuid Limburg · NLNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorldwide, recommendations for fruit and vegetable consumption are not met, which can cause chronic diseases. Especially adolescence is an important phase for the development of health behaviours. Therefore, in the Netherlands, the Healthy School program was established to aid schools in promoting healthy lifestyles among their students. We examined to what extent the variation between secondary schools regarding students' fruit and vegetable consumption could be explained by differences between schools regarding Healthy School certification, general school characteristics, and the school population. Additionally, we examined whether Healthy School certification was related to the outcomes, and whether the association differed for subgroups.

methodsWe performed a repeated cross-sectional multilevel study. We used data from multiple school years from the national Youth Health Monitor on secondary schools (grades 2 and 4, age ranged from approximately 12 to 18 years) of seven Public Health Services, and added data with regard to Healthy School certification, general school characteristics and school population characteristics. We included two outcomes: the number of days a student consumed fruit and vegetables per week. In total, we analysed data on 168,127 students from 256 secondary schools in the Netherlands.

resultsResults indicated that 2.87% of the variation in fruit consumption and 5.57% of the variation in vegetable consumption could be attributed to differences at the school-level. Characteristics related to high parental educational attainment, household income, and educational track of the students explained most of the variance between schools. Additionally, we found a small favourable association between Healthy School certification and the number of days secondary school students consumed fruit and vegetables.

conclusionsSchool population characteristics explained more variation between schools than Healthy School certification and general school characteristics, especially indicators of parental socioeconomic status. Nevertheless, Healthy School certification seemed to be slightly related to fruit and vegetable consumption, and might contribute to healthier dietary intake. We found small differences for some subgroups, but future research should focus on the impact in different school contexts, since we were restricted in the characteristics that could be included in this study.

Indexed as

FruitSchool Health ServicesSchoolsVegetablesAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleNetherlandsStudentsFruitMultilevel analysisSchool health promotionSecondary schoolVegetable

Identifiers

PMID38644493
PMCPMC11034157
OpenAlexW4395007633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.