ArticleExperimental animals2024
Automated scoring of glomerular injury in TNS2-deficient nephropathy.
Article in Experimental animals, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several artificial intelligence (AI) systems have been developed for glomerular pathology analysis in clinical settings. However, the application of AI systems in nonclinical fields remains limited. In this study, we trained a convolutional neural network model, which is an AI algorithm, to classify the severity of Tensin 2 (TNS2)-deficient nephropathy into seven categories. A dataset consisting of 803 glomerular images was generated from kidney sections of TNS2-deficient and wild-type mice. Manual evaluations of the images were conducted to assess their glomerular injury scores. The trained AI achieved approximately 70% accuracy in predicting the glomerular injury score for TNS2-deficient nephropathy. However, the AI achieved approximately 100% accuracy when considering predictions within one score of the true label as correct. The AI's predicted mean score closely matched the true mean score. In conclusion, while the AI model may not replace human judgment entirely, it can serve as a reliable second assessor in scoring glomerular injury, offering potential benefits in enhancing the accuracy and objectivity of such assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.