Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38643793›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

Leveraging natural capital accounting to support businesses with nature-related risk assessments and disclosures.

Jane Carter Ingram, Emily J McKenzie, Kenneth J Bagstad, John Finisdore, Rayne van den Berg, Eli Fenichel, Michael Vardon, Stephen Posner, Marta Santamaria, Lisa Mandle and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Science and technical priorities for private sector action to address biodiversity loss.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Bringing nature into decision-making.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jane Carter IngramPollination, Washington, DC 20037, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8365-7910
Emily J McKenzieTaskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures, London EC1A 2BN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8075-6435
Kenneth J BagstadUnited States Geological Survey, Reston, VA 20192, USA.
John FinisdorePoint Advisory, ERM, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Rayne van den BergForico, Kings Meadows, TAS 7249, Australia.
Eli FenichelSchool of Forestry and Environmental Studies Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Michael VardonAustralian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Stephen PosnerGarrison Institute, Garrison, NY 10524, USA.
Marta SantamariaCapitals Coalition, London EC2R 6JH, UK.
Lisa MandleStanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Richard BarkerInternational Financial Reporting Standards, London E14 4HD, UK.
James SpurgeonSustain Value, London, London SW19 2RR, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nature loss threatens businesses, the global economy and financial stability. Understanding and addressing these risks for business will require credible measurement approaches and data. This paper explores how natural capital accounting (NCA) can support business data and information needs related to nature, including disclosures aligned with the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures recommendations. As businesses seek to measure, manage and disclose their nature-related risks and opportunities, they will need well-organized, consistent and high-quality information regarding their dependencies and impacts on nature, which few businesses currently collect or track in-house. NCA may be useful for these purposes but has not been widely used or applied by businesses. National NCA guided by the U.N. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting may provide: (i) a useful framework for businesses in conceptualizing, organizing and managing nature-related data and statistics; and (ii) data and information that can directly support business disclosures, corporate NCA and other business applications. This paper explores these opportunities as well as synergies between national and corporate natural capital accounts. In addition, the paper discusses key barriers to advancing the wider use and benefits of NCA for business, including: awareness of NCA, data access, business capabilities related to NCA, spatial and temporal scales of data, audit and assurance considerations, potential risks, and costs and incentives. This article is part of the theme issue 'Bringing nature into decision-making'.

Indexed as

CommerceDisclosureAccountingConservation of Natural ResourcesRisk Assessmentbusinessnatural capital accountsnature risksystem of environmental-economic accountingTaskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures

Identifiers

PMID38643793
PMCPMC11033049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.