Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38643334›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2024

Participation and autonomy, independence in activities of daily living and upper extremity functioning in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Lamprini Lili, Katharina S Sunnerhagen, Tiina Rekand, Margit Alt Murphy

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Engagement of People With Lived Experience in Spinal Cord Injury to Address Innovation Priorities.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lamprini LiliDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Vita Straket 12, plan 4, 41346, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Katharina S SunnerhagenDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Vita Straket 12, plan 4, 41346, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Tiina RekandDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Vita Straket 12, plan 4, 41346, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Margit Alt MurphyDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Vita Straket 12, plan 4, 41346, Gothenburg, Sweden. margit.alt-murphy@neuro.gu.se.

Funding

Agreement of the Swedish government and the county councils (ALF) ALFGBG-879111Agreement of the Swedish government and the county councils (ALF) ALFGBG-932697Agreement of the Swedish government and the county councils (ALF) ALFGBG-965508local Research and Development Board for Gothenburg and Södra Bohuslän VGFOUGSB-868941Norrbacka-Eugeniastiftelsen 802/19, 803/20Sahlgrenska University Hospitals Research Foundations SU-793851Svenska Sällskapet för Medicinsk Forskning S19-0074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improvements in care and rehabilitation have resulted in a higher proportion of people living with spinal cord injury (SCI), which calls for an increased focus on participation and autonomy. This observational cross-sectional study investigated the impact of SCI on autonomy and how it correlates to activity performance and upper extremity functioning. A total of 25 adults (mean age 58 years) with chronic cervical or thoracic SCI were included. Self-perceived autonomy was measured with Impact on Participation and Autonomy questionnaire, independence in activities of daily living (ADL) with Spinal Cord Independence Measure, upper extremity functioning with Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and kinematic measures of the drinking task. The results showed that most participants perceived injury-related restrictions in outdoor autonomy (80%), family role (76%), and in indoor autonomy (72%). Independence in self-care (r = 0.72), mobility (r = 0.59) and upper extremity kinematics of movement time (r = 0.63) and smoothness (r = 0.49) were correlated to indoors autonomy. Social life autonomy was correlated to self-care (r = 0.50) and ARAT (r = 0.41). In conclusion, autonomy was perceived restricted after SCI in several major life areas and correlated with independence in ADL and upper extremity functioning. The aspects of autonomy should be considered more in goal setting and clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingSpinal Cord InjuriesAdultHumansMiddle AgedMovementSelf CareUpper ExtremityActivities of daily livingAutonomyIndependenceKinematicsParticipationSpinal cord injuryUpper extremity

Identifiers

PMID38643334
PMCPMC11032406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.