Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38643179›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

The effect of immunosuppressive therapies on the endothelial host response in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

M A Slim, E H T Lim, L A van Vught, A M Tuip-de Boer, E Rademaker, J L G Haitsma Mulier, J J Engel, Amsterdam UMC COVID-19 Biobank Study Group, Radboudumc Center for Infectious Diseases COVID-19 Study Group, P Pickkers and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

M A SlimCenter for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.a.slim@amsterdamumc.nl.
E H T LimDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
L A van VughtCenter for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
A M Tuip-de BoerLaboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers - Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
E RademakerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J L G Haitsma MulierDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J J EngelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC COVID-19 Biobank Study Group
Radboudumc Center for Infectious Diseases COVID-19 Study Group
P PickkersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
F L van de VeerdonkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
A P J VlaarDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
L P G DerdeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
N P JuffermansDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

ZonMw 10150062010003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While several effective therapies for critically ill patients with COVID-19 have been identified in large, well-conducted trials, the mechanisms underlying these therapies have not been investigated in depth. Our aim is to investigate the association between various immunosuppressive therapies (corticosteroids, tocilizumab and anakinra) and the change in endothelial host response over time in critically ill COVID-19 patients. We conducted a pre-specified multicenter post-hoc analysis in a Dutch cohort of COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU between March 2020 and September 2021 due to hypoxemic respiratory failure. A panel of 18 immune response biomarkers in the complement, coagulation and endothelial function domains were measured using ELISA or Luminex. Biomarkers were measured on day 0-1, day 2-4 and day 6-8 after start of COVID-19 treatment. Patients were categorized into four treatment groups: no immunomodulatory treatment, corticosteroids, anakinra plus corticosteroids, or tocilizumab plus corticosteroids. The association between treatment group and the change in concentrations of biomarkers was estimated with linear mixed-effects models, using no immunomodulatory treatment as reference group. 109 patients with a median age of 62 years [IQR 54-70] of whom 72% (n = 78) was male, were included in this analysis. Both anakinra plus corticosteroids (n = 22) and tocilizumab plus corticosteroids (n = 38) were associated with an increase in angiopoietin-1 compared to no immune modulator (n = 23) (beta of 0.033 [0.002-0.064] and 0.041 [0.013-0.070] per day, respectively). These treatments, as well as corticosteroids alone (n = 26), were further associated with a decrease in the ratio of angiopoietin-2/angiopoietin-1 (beta of 0.071 [0.034-0.107], 0.060 [0.030-0.091] and 0.043 [0.001-0.085] per day, respectively). Anakinra plus corticosteroids and tocilizumab plus corticosteroids were associated with a decrease in concentrations of complement complex 5b-9 compared to no immunomodulatory treatment (0.038 [0.006-0.071] and 0.023 [0.000-0.047], respectively). Currently established treatments for critically ill COVID-19 patients are associated with a change in biomarkers of the angiopoietin and complement pathways, possibly indicating a role for stability of the endothelium. These results increase the understanding of the mechanisms of interventions and are possibly useful for stratification of patients with other inflammatory conditions which may potentially benefit from these treatments.

Indexed as

COVID-19Adrenal Cortex HormonesAgedAngiopoietin-1BiomarkersCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentCritical IllnessHumansImmunosuppression TherapyInterleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist ProteinMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Adrenal Cortex HormonesAngiopoietin-1BiomarkersInterleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist ProteinCoagulationComplementCOVID-19Endothelial functionHost responseImmunomodulatory treatment

Identifiers

PMID38643179
PMCPMC11032323
OpenAlexW4394988796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.