ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024
TEC-miTarget: enhancing microRNA target prediction based on deep learning of ribonucleic acid sequences.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exercise-derived extracellular vesicles in oncology: a new frontier for translational nanomedicine.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Bioinformatic prediction, qCLASH, and AlphaFold3 reveal non-overlapping layers of the miR-214-3p-mRNA interactome.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- miRNAProtPred: computational prediction of human miRNA binding based on seed complementarity and thermodynamic stability.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- miRNA Target Prediction: An Overview of the Past and Current Tools.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Engineered MSC-Exosomes Delivering miRNAs for Respiratory Disease Diagnostics and Therapy: Opportunities and Challenges.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- MicroRNAs as Sensitizers of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Resistance in Cancer: Small Molecule Partnerships.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Multi-Input Neural Network Model for Accurate MicroRNA Target Site Detection.Non-coding RNA · 2025Article
- Review
- miCGR: interpretable deep neural network for predicting both site-level and gene-level functional targets of microRNA.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMicroRNAs play a critical role in regulating gene expression by binding to specific target sites within gene transcripts, making the identification of microRNA targets a prominent focus of research. Conventional experimental methods for identifying microRNA targets are both time-consuming and expensive, prompting the development of computational tools for target prediction. However, the existing computational tools exhibit limited performance in meeting the demands of practical applications, highlighting the need to improve the performance of microRNA target prediction models.
resultsIn this paper, we utilize the most popular natural language processing and computer vision technologies to propose a novel approach, called TEC-miTarget, for microRNA target prediction based on transformer encoder and convolutional neural networks. TEC-miTarget treats RNA sequences as a natural language and encodes them using a transformer encoder, a widely used encoder in natural language processing. It then combines the representations of a pair of microRNA and its candidate target site sequences into a contact map, which is a three-dimensional array similar to a multi-channel image. Therefore, the contact map's features are extracted using a four-layer convolutional neural network, enabling the prediction of interactions between microRNA and its candidate target sites. We applied a series of comparative experiments to demonstrate that TEC-miTarget significantly improves microRNA target prediction, compared with existing state-of-the-art models. Our approach is the first approach to perform comparisons with other approaches at both sequence and transcript levels. Furthermore, it is the first approach compared with both deep learning-based and seed-match-based methods. We first compared TEC-miTarget's performance with approaches at the sequence level, and our approach delivers substantial improvements in performance using the same datasets and evaluation metrics. Moreover, we utilized TEC-miTarget to predict microRNA targets in long mRNA sequences, which involves two steps: selecting candidate target site sequences and applying sequence-level predictions. We finally showed that TEC-miTarget outperforms other approaches at the transcript level, including the popular seed match methods widely used in previous years.
conclusionsWe propose a novel approach for predicting microRNA targets at both sequence and transcript levels, and demonstrate that our approach outperforms other methods based on deep learning or seed match. We also provide our approach as an easy-to-use software, TEC-miTarget, at https://github.com/tingpeng17/TEC-miTarget . Our results provide new perspectives for microRNA target prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.