Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38643011›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Protocol for the development of a core outcome set and reporting guidelines for locoregional treatment in neoadjuvant systemic breast cancer treatment trials: the PRECEDENT project.

Shelley Potter, Kerry Avery, Rosina Ahmed, Jana de Boniface, Sanjoy Chatterjee, David Dodwell, Peter Dubsky, Hiroji Iwata, Michael Jiang, Han-Byoel Lee and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The future of surgical research.The British journal of surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 15 institutions in 10 countries.

Shelley Potter *Bristol Surgical and Perioperative Care Complex Intervention Collaboration, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6977-312X
Kerry AveryBristol Surgical and Perioperative Care Complex Intervention Collaboration, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5477-2418
Rosina AhmedTata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Jana de BonifaceBreast Unit, Capio St. Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sanjoy ChatterjeeTata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
David DodwellUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Peter DubskyHirslanden Klinik St Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Hiroji IwataAichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Michael JiangBristol Surgical and Perioperative Care Complex Intervention Collaboration, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Han-Byoel LeeBreast Care Centre, Dept. of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Mairead MacKenzieIndependent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, UK.
Fiorita PoulakakiBreast Surgery Department, Athens Medical Centre, Athens, Greece.
Andrea L RichardsonJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Karla SepulvedaBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Andrew SpillaneUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Alastair M ThompsonDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Gustavo WerutskyLatin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Jean L WrightJohns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Nicholas ZdenkowskiThe University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Katherine CowanKatherine Cowan Consulting Limited, St. Leonards-on-Sea, UK.
Stuart McIntosh *Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK s.mcintosh@qub.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4123-9611
Baylor College of Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USTata Medical Center · INUniversity of Bristol · GBAichi Cancer Center · JPAthens Medical Center · GRKarolinska Institutet · SENorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBSeoul National University Hospital · KRThe Patients Association · GBThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Lucerne · CHUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNeoadjuvant systemic anticancer therapy (neoSACT) is increasingly used in the treatment of early breast cancer. Response to therapy is prognostic and allows locoregional and adjuvant systemic treatments to be tailored to minimise morbidity and optimise oncological outcomes and quality of life. Accurate information about locoregional treatments following neoSACT is vital to allow the translation of downstaging benefits into practice and facilitate meaningful interpretation of oncological outcomes, particularly locoregional recurrence. Reporting of locoregional treatments in neoSACT studies, however, is currently poor. The development of a core outcome set (COS) and reporting guidelines is one strategy by which this may be improved. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A COS for reporting locoregional treatment (surgery and radiotherapy) in neoSACT trials will be developed in accordance with Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) and Core Outcome Set-Standards for Development guidelines. Reporting guidance will be developed concurrently.The project will have three phases: (1) generation of a long list of relevant outcome domains and reporting items from a systematic review of published neoSACT studies and interviews with key stakeholders. Identified items and domains will be categorised and formatted into Delphi consensus questionnaire items. (2) At least two rounds of an international online Delphi survey in which at least 250 key stakeholders (surgeons/oncologists/radiologists/pathologists/trialists/methodologists) will score the importance of reporting each outcome. (3) A consensus meeting with key stakeholders to discuss and agree the final COS and reporting guidance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for the consensus process will be obtained from the Queen's University Belfast Faculty Ethics Committee. The COS/reporting guidelines will be presented at international meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. Dissemination materials will be produced in collaboration with our steering group and patient advocates so the results can be shared widely. REGISTRATION: The study has been prospectively registered on the COMET website (https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/2854).

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyResearch DesignConsensusDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareClinical TrialRADIOTHERAPYSURGERY

Identifiers

PMID38643011
PMCPMC11033665
OpenAlexW4394980243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.