Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38642322›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2024

Establishment of a mild cognitive impairment risk model in middle-aged and older adults: a longitudinal study.

Xin Zhang, Hong Fan, Chengnan Guo, Yi Li, Xinyu Han, Yiyun Xu, Haili Wang, Tiejun Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Progress on prognostic assessment methods for mild cognitive impairment].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xin ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hong FanDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chengnan GuoDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yi LiDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xinyu HanDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yiyun XuDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Haili WangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Tiejun ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety (Fudan University), Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. tjzhang@shmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5187-7393
Fudan University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81772170Special project on national science and technology basic resources investigation 2019FY101103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly identification individuals at high risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is essential for prevention and intervention strategies of dementia, such as Alzheimer's disease. MCI prediction considering the interdependence of predictors in longitudinal data needs to be further explored. We aimed to employ machine learning (ML) to develop and verify a prediction model of MCI.

methodsIn a longitudinal population-based cohort of China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), 8390 non-MCI participants were enrolled. The diagnosis of MCI was based on the aging-associated cognitive decline (AACD), and 13 factors (gender, education, marital status, residence, diabetes, hypertension, depression, hearing impairment, social isolation, physical activity, drinking status, body mass index and expenditure) were finally selected as predictors. We implemented a long short-term memory (LSTM) to predict the MCI risks in middle-aged and older adults within 7 years. The Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC) and calibration curve were used to evaluate the performance of the model.

resultsThrough 7 years of follow-up, 1925 participants developed MCI. The model for all incident MCI achieved an AUC of 0.774, and its deployment to the participants followed 2, 4, and 7 years achieved results of 0.739, 0.747, and 0.750, respectively. The model was well-calibrated with predicted probabilities plotted against the observed proportions of cognitive impairment. Education level, gender, marital status, and depression contributed most to the prediction of MCI.

conclusionsThis model could be widely applied to medical institutions, even in the community, to identify middle-aged and older adults at high risk of MCI.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionAgedChinaFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsAlzheimer’s diseaseCHARLSMachine learningMild cognitive impairmentPredictive model

Identifiers

PMID38642322
OpenAlexW4394977107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.