Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38642296›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024

From quantitative metrics to clinical success: assessing the utility of deep learning for tumor segmentation in breast surgery.

Chris Yeung, Tamas Ungi, Zoe Hu, Amoon Jamzad, Martin Kaufmann, Ross Walker, Shaila Merchant, Cecil Jay Engel, Doris Jabs, John Rudan and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chris YeungSchool of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. chris.yeung@queensu.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-7696-5043
Tamas UngiSchool of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Zoe HuSchool of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Amoon JamzadSchool of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Martin KaufmannDepartment of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Ross WalkerDepartment of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Shaila MerchantDepartment of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Cecil Jay EngelDepartment of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Doris JabsDepartment of Radiology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
John RudanDepartment of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Parvin MousaviSchool of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Gabor FichtingerSchool of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Queen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePreventing positive margins is essential for ensuring favorable patient outcomes following breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Deep learning has the potential to enable this by automatically contouring the tumor and guiding resection in real time. However, evaluation of such models with respect to pathology outcomes is necessary for their successful translation into clinical practice.

methodsSixteen deep learning models based on established architectures in the literature are trained on 7318 ultrasound images from 33 patients. Models are ranked by an expert based on their contours generated from images in our test set. Generated contours from each model are also analyzed using recorded cautery trajectories of five navigated BCS cases to predict margin status. Predicted margins are compared with pathology reports.

resultsThe best-performing model using both quantitative evaluation and our visual ranking framework achieved a mean Dice score of 0.959. Quantitative metrics are positively associated with expert visual rankings. However, the predictive value of generated contours was limited with a sensitivity of 0.750 and a specificity of 0.433 when tested against pathology reports.

conclusionWe present a clinical evaluation of deep learning models trained for intraoperative tumor segmentation in breast-conserving surgery. We demonstrate that automatic contouring is limited in predicting pathology margins despite achieving high performance on quantitative metrics.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningMargins of ExcisionMastectomy, SegmentalFemaleHumansSurgery, Computer-AssistedUltrasonography, MammaryBreast ultrasoundClinical evaluationDeep learningSurgical navigation

Identifiers

PMID38642296
OpenAlexW4394988439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.