Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38642219›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2024

What facets of physical function are most important to adults diagnosed with cancer?

Theresa Coles, Kate Plyler, Alexy Hernandez, Rebecca Fillipo, Debra M Henke, Cara Arizmendi, Sandhya Lagoo-Deenadayalan, C Rory Goodwin, Thomas W LeBlanc, Erica G Horodniceanu and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. What patients would have liked to have known in advance about physical function due to cancer treatment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Theresa ColesCenter for Health Measurement, Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St., Durham, NC, 27701, USA. Theresa.Coles@Duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2941-8999
Kate PlylerCenter for Health Measurement, Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St., Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
Alexy HernandezCenter for Health Measurement, Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St., Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
Rebecca FillipoCenter for Health Measurement, Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St., Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
Debra M HenkeCenter for Health Measurement, Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St., Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
Cara ArizmendiCenter for Health Measurement, Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St., Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
Sandhya Lagoo-DeenadayalanDepartment of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
C Rory GoodwinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Thomas W LeBlancDivision of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Erica G HorodniceanuOncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food & Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Vishal BhatnagarOncology Center of Excellence, U.S. Food & Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Bryce B ReeveCenter for Health Measurement, Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St., Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
Kevin P WeinfurtCenter for Health Measurement, Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St., Durham, NC, 27701, USA.

Funding

U.S. Food and Drug Administration 75F40120C00069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSuccessful patient-focused drug development involves selecting and measuring outcomes in clinical trials that are important to patients. The U.S. Food & Drug Administration's definition of clinical benefit includes how patients feel, function, or survive. Patients are considered the experts in describing how they feel and function. In cancer trials, patient-reported measures of physical function provide insight into how patients function at baseline, benefit from the interventions being studied, and the impact of treatment side effects. We conducted a qualitative study with adults diagnosed with cancer to describe facets of physical function from their perspective and to identify which facets are most important to this patient population.

methodsUsing concept elicitation and cognitive interviewing techniques, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 72 adults ≥ 22 years of age with cancer who received treatment with an anticancer drug or biologic within six months of the interview. We selected participants using purposive sampling with the aim to elicit diverse experiences regarding how they may interpret and respond to questions related to physical function. Participants were presented with patient-reported outcome (PRO) items representative of PRO measures used in cancer and general populations.

resultsFive facets of how physical function relates to activities were defined from the patient perspective: ability, difficulty, limitation, satisfaction, and completion. More than half of the participants indicated that ability was the most important facet of physical function. The next most important were satisfaction (18.3%), limitation (14.1%), difficulty (5.6%), and completion (2.8%).

conclusionThis study demonstrates that we must be more specific about the facets of physical function that we set out to assess when we use PRO measures to describe the patient experience. These results have implications for the specificity of physical function facets when measured in cancer clinical trials.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsQualitative ResearchActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeCancerPatient-reported outcome measuresPhysical functionQualitative researchQuestionnaire

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.