Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38641973›Full record

ArticleThe Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology2024

Assessing preconception health in Australia to support better outcomes in the first 2000 days - A critical need for building a core indicator framework.

Asvini K Subasinghe, Kirsten I Black, Edwina Dorney, Jacqueline A Boyle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Asvini K SubasingheDepartment of Health Systems and Equity, Eastern Health Clinical SchoolMonash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6045-2728
Kirsten I BlackFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0030-2431
Edwina DorneyFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2891-4782
Jacqueline A BoyleDepartment of Health Systems and Equity, Eastern Health Clinical SchoolMonash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3616-1637

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council App1171142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2021, the Preconception Health Network Australia co-developed preconception health core indicators identified as critical to ensuring optimal maternal and child outcomes following conception. We conducted an audit of perinatal databases across each state and territory to identify whether preconception core indicator data were available. Seven health domains co-developed by the Preconception Health Network were mapped against the data collected in the perinatal databases. Indicator data were lacking across all seven health domains, with data missing for social determinants of health indicators. Better data linkage and developing a national evidence-based framework would allow ongoing monitoring of women's preconception health nationally.

Indexed as

Preconception CareAustraliaDatabases, FactualFemaleHealth Status IndicatorsHumansPregnancyattitudeshealth knowledgeintentionmaternal healthpracticepreconception carepregnancyprevention & controlpublic healthsocial determinants of healthwomen's health

Identifiers

PMID38641973
PMCPMC11660029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.