ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024
Comparison of Outcomes between Single-Level and Double-Level Corpectomy in Thoracolumbar Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study of 16 Patients Using Expandable Cages.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early clinical efficacy of 3D-printed artificial vertebral body in spinal reconstruction after total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal tumors.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reconstruction surgery using titanium vertebral body replacements aids in spinal stability after damage. Functional evaluation includes Nurick and ASIA grading systems. This study compares outcomes of single and double-level corpectomy in patients treated with thoracolumbar reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS Records of 16 patients who underwent vertebral reconstruction with expandable cages after single (n=9) and double (n=8) corpectomy were analyzed retrospectively. Thoracal and lumbar cases were approached posteriorly (n=14). Clinical evaluation was performed by neurological examination, Nurick Scale, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Neurological Scores, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Preoperative and postoperative 3-month scores were recorded. Radiological evaluation was performed by calculation of regional angulation and postoperative recovery of vertebral body height. RESULTS Preoperatively, 2 patients had no motor or functional sensory deficits (ASIA grade E) and 6 patients were ASIA grade D. Immediately after surgery, 4 of the ASIA grade D patients improved to ASIA grade E, while 2 patients remained ASIA grade D during follow-up. Four patients were ASIA grade A; their conditions showed no improvement postoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative 3-month Nurick grade was statistically significant (P=0.022). Postoperative Cobb angle improved by a mean of 5.4° (P=0.001). Improvement by at least 1 grade in neurological recovery was observed in 6 (38%) of the cases. Pain scores analyzed using the VAS changed from a mean of 7 to a mean of 2.63 (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS In our experience, expandable cages are useful in the restoration of different pathologies of the thoracolumbar trunk with low complication and revision rates. With expandable cages it is possible to achieve restoration of the Cobb angle, improvement in Nurick Grade and effective pain palliation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.