Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38641851›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2024

Ventilator-associated pneumonia related to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacterales during severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection: risk factors and prognosis.

Keyvan Razazi, Charles-Edouard Luyt, Guillaume Voiriot, Anahita Rouzé, Marc Garnier, Alexis Ferré, Laurent Camous, Nicholas Heming, Nathanaël Lapidus, Anais Charles-Nelson and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Keyvan RazaziHôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, DMU Médecine, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 94010, Créteil, France. keyvan.razazi@aphp.fr.
Charles-Edouard Luyt *Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Sorbonne-Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, and Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), 47-83, Boulevard de L'Hôpital, 75651, Paris, France.
Guillaume Voiriot *Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Anahita Rouzé *Inserm U1285, CHU Lille, Service de Médecine Intensive - Réanimation, CNRS, UMR 8576 - UGSF - Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, Univ. Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Marc GarnierGRC29, DMU DREAM, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Department, Tenon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Alexis FerréIntensive Care Unit, Versailles Hospital, Le Chesnay, France.
Laurent CamousMedical and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Guadeloupe Teaching Hospital, Antilles-Guyane University, Les Abymes, France.
Nicholas HemingDepartment of Intensive Care, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, APHP University Versailles Saint Quentin - University Paris Saclay, Paris, France.
Nathanaël LapidusINSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Public Health Department, Sorbonne University, 75012, Paris, France.
Anais Charles-Nelson *Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Unité d'Épidémiologie et de Recherche Clinique, INSERM, Centre d'Investigation Clinique1418, Module Épidémiologie Clinique, AP-HP (Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris), Paris, France.
Armand Mekontso-Dessap *Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, DMU Médecine, Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 94010, Créteil, France.
COVID-ICU Group on behalf of the REVA Network and the COVID-ICU Investigators
Sorbonne Université · FRInserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Pointe-à-Pitre · GPAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre Hospitalier de Versailles · FRHôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor · FRInstitut Pierre Louis d‘Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique · FRUniversité Paris-Est Créteil · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV 2) and requiring mechanical ventilation suffer from a high incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), mainly related to Enterobacterales. Data regarding extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) VAP are scarce. We aimed to investigate risk factors and outcomes of ESBL-E related VAP among critically ill coronavirus infectious disease-19 (COVID-19) patients who developed Enterobacterales related VAP. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe performed an ancillary analysis of a multicenter prospective international cohort study (COVID-ICU) that included 4929 COVID-19 critically ill patients. For the present analysis, only patients with complete data regarding resistance status of the first episode of Enterobacterales related VAP (ESBL-E and/or carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, CRE) and outcome were included.

resultsWe included 591 patients with Enterobacterales related VAP. The main causative species were Enterobacter sp (n = 224), E. coli (n = 111) and K. pneumoniae (n = 104). One hundred and fifteen patients (19%), developed a first ESBL-E related VAP, mostly related to Enterobacter sp (n = 40), K. pneumoniae (n = 36), and E. coli (n = 31). Eight patients (1%) developed CRE related VAP. In a multivariable analysis, African origin (North Africa or Sub-Saharan Africa) (OR 1.7 [1.07-2.71], p = 0.02), time between intubation and VAP (OR 1.06 [1.02-1.09], p = 0.002), PaO

conclusionESBL-related VAP in COVID-19 critically-ill patients was not infrequent. Several risk factors were identified, among which some are modifiable and deserve further investigation. There was no impact of resistance of the first Enterobacterales related episode of VAP on outcome.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associatedbeta-LactamasesCohort StudiesCritical IllnessEscherichia coliHumansIntensive Care UnitsKlebsiella pneumoniaePrognosisProspective StudiesRisk Factorsbeta-LactamasesARDSCOVID-19ESBLNosocomial pneumoniaVentilator-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID38641851
PMCPMC11031867
OpenAlexW4394978673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.