Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38641814›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2024

A quantitative and qualitative analysis of patient group narratives suggests common biopsychosocial red flags of undiagnosed rare disease.

Mariam Al-Attar, Sondra Butterworth, Lucy McKay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Patient passports for rare diseases: results of a pilot study.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mariam Al-AttarSalford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
Sondra ButterworthRareQol Ltd, Unit 1 Edison Court, Ellice Way, Wrexham, LL13 7YT, UK.
Lucy McKayMedics4RareDiseases, Unit 12 Treadaway Technical Centre, Treadaway Hill, High Wycombe, Loudwater, HP10 9RS, UK. lucy@m4rd.org.ORCID 0009-0004-6976-2668
Highways England · GBSalford Royal Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 'diagnostic odyssey' is a common challenge faced by patients living with rare diseases and poses a significant burden for patients, their families and carers, and the healthcare system. The diagnosis of rare diseases in clinical settings is challenging, with patients typically experiencing a multitude of unnecessary tests and procedures. To improve diagnosis of rare disease, clinicians require evidence-based guidance on when their patient may be presenting with a rare disease. This study aims to identify common experiences amongst patients with rare diseases, to inform a series of 'red flags' that can aid diagnosis of rare diseases in non-specialist settings. A questionnaire was developed by Medics for Rare Diseases, informed by the experiences of clinicians, rare disease patients and patient advocates, and was shared with UK-based rare disease patient groups. Study participants were engaged via social media platforms, blogs and email newsletters of three umbrella rare disease organisations. The questionnaire, comprising 22 questions, was designed to identify typical experiences relating to physical and psychosocial manifestations and presentation of disease, patient interactions with healthcare providers, and family history.

resultsQuestionnaire responses were received from 79 different rare disease patient groups and the common experiences identified were used to inform seven red flags of rare disease: multi-system involvement (3 or more); genetic inheritance pattern; continued presentation throughout childhood and adulthood; difficulties at school, especially relating to absences, difficulty participating in physical education and experiences of bullying or social isolation; multiple specialist referrals; extended period with unexplained symptoms; and misdiagnosis. In light of the red flags identified, recommendations for primary care and education settings have been proposed, focusing on the need for holistic assessment and awareness of both physical and psychosocial factors.

conclusionsThis study identified key commonalities experienced by patients with rare disease across physical and psychosocial domains, in addition to understanding patients' history and experiences with healthcare providers. These findings could be used to develop a clinical decision‑making tool to support non-specialist practitioners to consider when their patient may have an undiagnosed rare condition, which may minimise the challenges of the 'diagnostic odyssey' and improve the patient experience.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareRare DiseasesCaregiversChildHealth PersonnelHumansBiopsychosocialClinical presentationDiagnostic delayDiagnostic odysseyMixed methods researchNarrative medicinePatient experiencePatient surveyRare diseaseRed flags

Identifiers

PMID38641814
PMCPMC11031885
OpenAlexW4394952334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.