Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38641769›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Exploring women's experiences of care during hospital childbirth in rural Tanzania: a qualitative study.

Emmy Metta, Regine Unkels, Lilian Teddy Mselle, Claudia Hanson, Helle Molsted Alvesson, Fadhlun M Alwy Al-Beity

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emmy MettaDepartment of Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Regine UnkelsDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lilian Teddy MselleDepartment of Clinical Nursing, School of Nursing, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Claudia HansonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Helle Molsted AlvessonDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fadhlun M Alwy Al-BeityDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. fadhlun.alwy.al-beity@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2416-6876
Karolinska Institutet · SEMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen's childbirth experiences provide a unique understanding of care received in health facilities from their voices as they describe their needs, what they consider good and what should be changed. Quality Improvement interventions in healthcare are often designed without inputs from women as end-users, leading to a lack of consideration for their needs and expectations. Recently, quality improvement interventions that incorporate women's childbirth experiences are thought to result in healthcare services that are more responsive and grounded in the end-user's needs.

aimThis study aimed to explore women's childbirth experiences to inform a co-designed quality improvement intervention in Southern Tanzania.

methodsThis exploratory qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with women after childbirth (n = 25) in two hospitals in Southern Tanzania. Reflexive thematic analysis was applied using the World Health Organization's Quality of Care framework on experiences of care domains.

resultsThree themes emerged from the data: (1) Women's experiences of communication with providers varied (2) Respect and dignity during intrapartum care is not guaranteed; (3) Women had varying experience of support during labour. Verbal mistreatment and threatening language for adverse birthing outcomes were common. Women appreciated physical or emotional support through human interaction. Some women would have wished for more support, but most accepted the current practices as they were.

conclusionThe experiences of care described by women during childbirth varied from one woman to the other. Expectations towards empathic care seemed low, and the little interaction women had during labour and birth was therefore often appreciated and mistreatment normalized. Potential co-designed interventions should include strategies to (i) empower women to voice their needs during childbirth and (ii) support healthcare providers to have competencies to be more responsive to women's needs.

Indexed as

Labor, ObstetricMaternal Health ServicesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHospitalsHumansParturitionPregnancyQualitative ResearchTanzaniaBirth companionshipChildbirthCo-designQuality improvementRespectful careRural health servicesTanzaniaWomen’s experiences

Identifiers

PMID38641769
PMCPMC11027221
OpenAlexW4394958237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.