Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38641713›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Deep learning prediction of renal anomalies for prenatal ultrasound diagnosis.

Olivier X Miguel, Emily Kaczmarek, Inok Lee, Robin Ducharme, Alysha L J Dingwall-Harvey, Ruth Rennicks White, Brigitte Bonin, Richard I Aviv, Steven Hawken, Christine M Armour and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prenatal body fluid analysis in the evaluation of CAKUT.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Olivier X MiguelClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Emily KaczmarekChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Inok LeeClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Robin DucharmeClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Alysha L J Dingwall-HarveyClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Ruth Rennicks WhiteClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Brigitte BoninDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H-8L6, Canada.
Richard I AvivDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Steven HawkenClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Christine M ArmourChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Kevin DickChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Mark C WalkerClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada. mwalker@toh.ca.

Funding

CIHR FDN 148438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning algorithms have demonstrated remarkable potential in clinical diagnostics, particularly in the field of medical imaging. In this study, we investigated the application of deep learning models in early detection of fetal kidney anomalies. To provide an enhanced interpretation of those models' predictions, we proposed an adapted two-class representation and developed a multi-class model interpretation approach for problems with more than two labels and variable hierarchical grouping of labels. Additionally, we employed the explainable AI (XAI) visualization tools Grad-CAM and HiResCAM, to gain insights into model predictions and identify reasons for misclassifications. The study dataset consisted of 969 ultrasound images from unique patients; 646 control images and 323 cases of kidney anomalies, including 259 cases of unilateral urinary tract dilation and 64 cases of unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney. The best performing model achieved a cross-validated area under the ROC curve of 91.28% ± 0.52%, with an overall accuracy of 84.03% ± 0.76%, sensitivity of 77.39% ± 1.99%, and specificity of 87.35% ± 1.28%. Our findings emphasize the potential of deep learning models in predicting kidney anomalies from limited prenatal ultrasound imagery. The proposed adaptations in model representation and interpretation represent a novel solution to multi-class prediction problems.

Indexed as

Deep LearningKidney DiseasesUrinary TractFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisUltrasonography, PrenatalDeep learningKidney anomaly diagnosisUltrasound imagery

Identifiers

PMID38641713
PMCPMC11031588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.