Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38641673›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Identification of CT radiomic features robust to acquisition and segmentation variations for improved prediction of radiotherapy-treated lung cancer patient recurrence.

Thomas Louis, François Lucia, François Cousin, Carole Mievis, Nicolas Jansen, Bernard Duysinx, Romain Le Pennec, Dimitris Visvikis, Malik Nebbache, Martin Rehn and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Thomas Louis *Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium. Thomas.louis@chuliege.be.
François Lucia *Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium. francois.lucia@chu-brest.fr.
François CousinDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Carole MievisDepartment of Radiotherapy Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Nicolas JansenDepartment of Radiotherapy Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Bernard DuysinxDivision of Pulmonology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Romain Le PennecNuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France.
Dimitris VisvikisLaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University of Brest, Brest, France.
Malik NebbacheRadiation Oncology Department, University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France.
Martin RehnRadiation Oncology Department, University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France.
Mohamed HamyaRadiation Oncology Department, University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France.
Margaux GeierMedical Oncology Department, University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France.
Pierre-Yves SalaunNuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France.
Ulrike SchickRadiation Oncology Department, University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France.
Mathieu HattLaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University of Brest, Brest, France.
Philippe CouckeDepartment of Radiotherapy Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Pierre Lovinfosse *Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Roland Hustinx *Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary objective of the present study was to identify a subset of radiomic features extracted from primary tumor imaged by computed tomography of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients, which remain unaffected by variations in segmentation quality and in computed tomography image acquisition protocol. The robustness of these features to segmentation variations was assessed by analyzing the correlation of feature values extracted from lesion volumes delineated by two annotators. The robustness to variations in acquisition protocol was evaluated by examining the correlation of features extracted from high-dose and low-dose computed tomography scans, both of which were acquired for each patient as part of the stereotactic body radiotherapy planning process. Among 106 radiomic features considered, 21 were identified as robust. An analysis including univariate and multivariate assessments was subsequently conducted to estimate the predictive performance of these robust features on the outcome of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy. The univariate predictive analysis revealed that robust features demonstrated superior predictive potential compared to non-robust features. The multivariate analysis indicated that linear regression models built with robust features displayed greater generalization capabilities by outperforming other models in predicting the outcomes of an external validation dataset.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsRadiosurgerySmall Cell Lung CarcinomaHumansRadiomicsTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID38641673
PMCPMC11031577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.