Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38641664›Full record

ReviewNature plants2024

Mycoheterotrophy in the wood-wide web.

Vincent S F T Merckx, Sofia I F Gomes, Deyi Wang, Cas Verbeek, Hans Jacquemyn, Franziska E Zahn, Gerhard Gebauer, Martin I Bidartondo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature plants, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. PhenylalanineThe New phytologist · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. PhytoKeys · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Selfish genes and mother trees.Nature plants · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vincent S F T MerckxUnderstanding Evolution, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. vincent.merckx@naturalis.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-3959-8623
Sofia I F GomesAbove-belowground Interactions, Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7218-1531
Deyi WangUnderstanding Evolution, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Cas VerbeekUnderstanding Evolution, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0007-8416-9100
Hans JacquemynPlant Population Biology and Conservation, Department of Biology, Plant Conservation and Population Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9600-5794
Franziska E ZahnLaboratory of Isotope Biogeochemistry, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Gerhard GebauerLaboratory of Isotope Biogeochemistry, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1577-7501
Martin I BidartondoRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 101045057Novo Nordisk Fonden (Novo Nordisk Foundation) NNF20OC0059948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence and potential functions of common mycorrhizal networks, or the 'wood-wide web', resulting from the simultaneous interaction of mycorrhizal fungi and roots of different neighbouring plants have been increasingly capturing the interest of science and society, sometimes leading to hyperbole and misinterpretation. Several recent reviews conclude that popular claims regarding the widespread nature of these networks in forests and their role in the transfer of resources and information between plants lack evidence. Here we argue that mycoheterotrophic plants associated with ectomycorrhizal or arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi require resource transfer through common mycorrhizal networks and thus are natural evidence for the occurrence and function of these networks, offering a largely overlooked window into this methodologically challenging underground phenomenon. The wide evolutionary and geographic distribution of mycoheterotrophs and their interactions with a broad phylogenetic range of mycorrhizal fungi indicate that common mycorrhizal networks are prevalent, particularly in forests, and result in net carbon transfer among diverse plants through shared mycorrhizal fungi. On the basis of the available scientific evidence, we propose a continuum of carbon transfer options within common mycorrhizal networks, and we discuss how knowledge on the biology of mycoheterotrophic plants can be instrumental for the study of mycorrhizal-mediated transfers between plants.

Indexed as

MycorrhizaePlantsWoodCarbonForestsHeterotrophic ProcessesPlant RootsSymbiosisCarbon

Identifiers

PMID38641664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.