Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38641422›Full record

Trial reportCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2024

Evaluating the Reach of a Patient Navigation Program for Follow-up Colonoscopy in a Large Federally Qualified Health Center.

Priyanka Gautom, Ana G Rosales, Amanda F Petrik, Jamie H Thompson, Matthew T Slaughter, Leslie Mosso, Syed A Hussain, Ricardo Jimenez, Gloria D Coronado

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Priyanka GautomKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0003-3941-9506
Ana G RosalesKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0009-0008-7247-8560
Amanda F PetrikKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0002-8891-6042
Jamie H ThompsonKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0003-3922-4880
Matthew T SlaughterKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0001-9025-5266
Leslie MossoSea Mar Community Health Centers, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0009-0000-2722-3894
Syed A HussainSea Mar Community Health Centers, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0009-0008-8909-9364
Ricardo JimenezSea Mar Community Health Centers, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0009-0001-2861-5731
Gloria D CoronadoKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0003-1130-6542
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USCommunity Health Center · US

Funding

NW Center of Excellence & K12 in Patient Centered Learning Health Systems ScienceK12HS026370 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI EDEN, KAREN BEEKMAN, GUISE, JEANNE-MARIE · 2018 to 2022
$4.0M
Prediciting and addressing colonoscopy non-adherence in community settingsR01CA218923 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CORONADO, GLORIA D · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
AHRQ HHS K12 HS026370National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01CA218923NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient navigation (PN) has been shown to improve participation in cancer screening, including colorectal cancer screening, and is now a recommended practice by the Community Preventive Services Task Force. Despite the effectiveness of PN programs, little is known about the number of contacts needed to successfully reach patients or about the demographic and healthcare utilization factors associated with reach. PRECISE was an individual randomized study of PN versus usual care conducted as a partnership between two large health systems in the Pacific Northwest. The navigation program was a six-topic area telephonic program designed to support patients with an abnormal fecal test result to obtain a follow-up colonoscopy. We report the number of contact attempts needed to successfully reach navigated patients. We used logistic regression to report the demographic and healthcare utilization characteristics associated with patients allocated to PN who were successfully reached. We identified 1,200 patients with an abnormal fecal immunochemical test result, of whom 970 were randomized into the study (45.7% were female, 17.5% were Spanish-speaking, and the mean age was 60.8 years). Of the 479 patients allocated to the PN intervention, 382 (79.7%) were reached within 18 call attempts, and nearly all (n = 356; 93.2%) were reached within six contact attempts. Patient characteristics associated with reach were race, county of residence, and body mass index. Our findings can guide future efforts to optimize the reach of PN programs. Prevention Relevance: The findings from this large study can inform clinic-level implementation of future PN programs in Federally Qualified Health Centers to improve the reach of patients needing cancer screenings, optimize staff resources, and ultimately increase cancer screenings.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerPatient NavigationAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOccult Blood

Identifiers

PMID38641422
PMCPMC11219256
OpenAlexW4394978584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.