ArticleMolecular cancer therapeutics2024
Assessment of Patient-Derived Xenograft Growth and Antitumor Activity: The NCI PDXNet Consensus Recommendations.
Article in Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tumor-on-chip as a personalized platform for rapid drug testing in breast cancer.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Bridging tumor growth dynamics and survival in preclinical oncology drug development - a Tumor Growth Inhibition and Time-to-Event (TGI-TTE) modeling framework.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2026Article
- Personalized targeting of BCL2 family proteins overcomes acquired resistance to BRAF-MEK inhibitors in preclinical melanoma.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Bridging Tumor Growth Dynamics and Survival in Preclinical Oncology Drug Development - A Translational Tumor Growth Inhibition and Time to Event (TGI-TTE) Modeling Framework.Research square · 2026Article
- Variable cellular and radiobiological effects of [Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026Article
- A BRN2:MYC transcriptional axis regulates interconversion between therapy-resistant and tumorigenic phenotypes in melanoma.Cell reports · 2025Article
- Advances and Challenges in Drug Screening for Cancer Therapy: A Comprehensive Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Current State-of-the-Art Animal Models of Pediatric Brain Tumors.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Efficacy of ATR Kinase Inhibitor Elimusertib Monotherapy or Combination in Tumors with DNA Damage Response Pathway and Other Genomic Alterations.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2025Article
- Acquired resistance in cancer: towards targeted therapeutic strategies.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025Review
- PDX models for functional precision oncology and discovery science.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025Review
- Opportunities and challenges for patient-derived models of brain tumors in functional precision medicine.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Review
- Antitumor Activity and Biomarker Analysis for TROP2 Antibody-Drug Conjugate Datopotamab Deruxtecan in Patient-Derived Breast Cancer Xenograft Models.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Article
- Patient-Derived Xenografts of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Enable Deconvolution and Prediction of Chemotherapy Responses.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- A precision oncology-focused deep learning framework for personalized selection of cancer therapy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- XENTURION is a population-level multidimensional resource of xenografts and tumoroids from metastatic colorectal cancer patients.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Building Equitable Cancer Research Infrastructure: Successful Transfer of Patient-Derived Xenograft Technology to a Historically Black University.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although patient-derived xenografts (PDX) are commonly used for preclinical modeling in cancer research, a standard approach to in vivo tumor growth analysis and assessment of antitumor activity is lacking, complicating the comparison of different studies and determination of whether a PDX experiment has produced evidence needed to consider a new therapy promising. We present consensus recommendations for assessment of PDX growth and antitumor activity, providing public access to a suite of tools for in vivo growth analyses. We expect that harmonizing PDX study design and analysis and assessing a suite of analytical tools will enhance information exchange and facilitate identification of promising novel therapies and biomarkers for guiding cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.